Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) vs EnerSys (ENS)
BAH leads on 11 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation and EnerSys across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 24, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — BAH vs ENS
growth of $100 · last 16yBAH +231.8%ENS +658.7%ENS compounded faster
BAH ENS
BAH vs ENS: by the numbers
- •ENS is the larger company ($7.97B vs $7.66B market cap).
- •BAH trades at the lower earnings multiple (9.26 vs 28.98 P/E).
- •ENS converts more revenue to profit (7.82% vs 7.57% net margin).
- •BAH grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.38% vs 4.73% CAGR).
- •BAH pays the higher dividend yield (3.57% vs 0.47%).
Which is better, BAH or ENS?
Metric tally: BAH 11 · ENS 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueBAH(lower P/E)
GrowthBAH(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeBAH(higher dividend yield)
QualityBAH(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BAH | ENS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 9.26● | 28.98 |
| Forward P/E | 10.51● | 21.60 |
| P/S ratio | 0.69● | 2.27 |
| P/B ratio | 6.98 | 4.47● |
| PEG ratio | 0.25● | 0.26 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.17● | 18.13 |
| FCF yield | 12.33%● | 5.49% |
Profitability
| Metric | BAH | ENS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 44.51%● | 29.26% |
| Operating margin | 9.21% | 11.87%● |
| Net margin | 7.57% | 7.82%● |
| ROE | 76.83%● | 15.40% |
| ROIC | 18.60%● | 12.37% |
Dividends
| Metric | BAH | ENS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.57%● | 0.47% |
| Payout ratio | 33.00% | 13.39% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BAH | ENS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 7.38%● | 4.73% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 9.45% | 18.40%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 8.54% | 10.15%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -4.21% | 18.59%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BAH or ENS?
- It depends on your goal. value: BAH (lower P/E); growth: BAH (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: BAH (higher dividend yield); quality: BAH (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, BAH leads 11 to 6.
- Is BAH or ENS cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, BAH is cheaper: BAH trades at a 9.26 P/E and ENS at 28.98.
- Which has grown faster, BAH or ENS?
- Over the past five years, BAH grew revenue faster — BAH at a 7.38% CAGR versus ENS at 4.73%.
- Does BAH or ENS pay a bigger dividend?
- BAH yields 3.57% and ENS yields 0.47% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BAH or ENS more profitable?
- ENS runs the higher net margin — BAH at 7.57% versus ENS at 7.82%.
- Which has been the better investment, BAH or ENS?
- Over the past 10-year, ENS delivered the higher annualized total return — BAH at 10.14% versus ENS at 15.03%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Booz Allen Hamilton P/E ratioEnerSys P/E ratioBooz Allen Hamilton dividend yieldEnerSys dividend yieldBooz Allen Hamilton ROEEnerSys ROEBooz Allen Hamilton operating marginEnerSys operating marginBooz Allen Hamilton revenue growthEnerSys revenue growthBooz Allen Hamilton free cash flowEnerSys free cash flow
Booz Allen Hamilton & EnerSys appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 24, 2026.