Which has the lower trailing P/E, BAH or ENS?

BAH has the lower trailing P/E: BAH trades at 10.56 and ENS at 21.02. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, BAH or ENS?

Over the past five years, BAH grew revenue faster — BAH at a 7.05% CAGR versus ENS at 4.20%.

Does BAH or ENS pay a bigger dividend?

BAH yields 3.44% and ENS yields 0.55% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is BAH or ENS more profitable?

ENS runs the higher net margin — BAH at 7.01% versus ENS at 9.29%.

How have BAH and ENS total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, BAH delivered 9.84% and ENS delivered 12.02% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) vs EnerSys (ENS)

A side-by-side comparison of Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation and EnerSys across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 4, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

BAH

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation

$8.10B

$67.35IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

ENS

EnerSys

$7.16B

$196.30IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — BAH vs ENS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

BAH +154.2% (+9.8%/yr)ENS +213.4% (+12.1%/yr)ENS compounded faster over this window

BAH ENS

BAH vs ENS: by the numbers

•BAH is the larger company ($8.10B vs $7.16B market cap).
•BAH trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (10.56 vs 21.02 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•ENS converts more revenue to profit (9.29% vs 7.01% net margin).
•BAH grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.05% vs 4.20% CAGR).
•BAH pays the higher dividend yield (3.44% vs 0.55%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BAH	ENS
P/E ratio	10.56	21.02
Forward P/E	10.59	14.68
PEG ratio	1.10	1.15
P/S ratio	0.73	1.89
P/B ratio	6.74	3.63
EV / EBITDA	9.58	12.21
FCF yield	13.78%	10.02%

Profitability

Metric	BAH	ENS
Gross margin	20.91%	30.51%
Operating margin	9.51%	13.45%
Net margin	7.01%	9.29%
ROE	64.73%	17.89%
ROIC	15.99%	13.39%

Dividends

Metric	BAH	ENS
Dividend yield	3.44%	0.55%
Payout ratio	36.36%	11.51%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BAH	ENS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	7.05%	4.20%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	9.45%	18.40%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	17.83%	39.95%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-1.66%	21.83%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, BAH or ENS?: BAH has the lower trailing P/E: BAH trades at 10.56 and ENS at 21.02. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, BAH or ENS?: Over the past five years, BAH grew revenue faster — BAH at a 7.05% CAGR versus ENS at 4.20%.
Does BAH or ENS pay a bigger dividend?: BAH yields 3.44% and ENS yields 0.55% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is BAH or ENS more profitable?: ENS runs the higher net margin — BAH at 7.01% versus ENS at 9.29%.
How have BAH and ENS total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, BAH delivered 9.84% and ENS delivered 12.02% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BAH analysis Full ENS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Booz Allen Hamilton P/E ratio EnerSys P/E ratio Booz Allen Hamilton dividend yield EnerSys dividend yield Booz Allen Hamilton ROE EnerSys ROE Booz Allen Hamilton operating margin EnerSys operating margin Booz Allen Hamilton revenue growth EnerSys revenue growth Booz Allen Hamilton free cash flow EnerSys free cash flow

Booz Allen Hamilton & EnerSys appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 4, 2026.