Which has the lower trailing P/E, BAC or SCHW?

BAC has the lower trailing P/E: BAC trades at 14.21 and SCHW at 20.42. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, BAC or SCHW?

Over the past five years, BAC grew revenue faster — BAC at a 14.65% CAGR versus SCHW at 13.03%.

Does BAC or SCHW pay a bigger dividend?

BAC yields 1.82% and SCHW yields 0.81% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is BAC or SCHW more profitable?

SCHW runs the higher net margin — BAC at 18.95% versus SCHW at 33.62%.

How have BAC and SCHW total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, BAC delivered 17.60% and SCHW delivered 15.40% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW)

A side-by-side comparison of Bank of America Corporation and The Charles Schwab Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 23, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

BAC

Bank of America Corporation

$437.79B

$61.69Financial ServicesAt close: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

SCHW

The Charles Schwab Corporation

$195.31B

$112.30Financial ServicesAt close: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Total return — BAC vs SCHW

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

BAC +406.4% (+17.6%/yr)SCHW +312.4% (+15.2%/yr)BAC compounded faster over this window

BAC SCHW

BAC vs SCHW: by the numbers

•BAC is the larger company ($437.79B vs $195.31B market cap).
•BAC trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (14.21 vs 20.42 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•SCHW converts more revenue to profit (33.62% vs 18.95% net margin).
•BAC grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.65% vs 13.03% CAGR).
•BAC pays the higher dividend yield (1.82% vs 0.81%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BAC	SCHW
P/E ratio	14.21	20.42
Forward P/E	13.28	17.28
P/S ratio	2.53	6.50
P/B ratio	1.49	3.91

Profitability

Metric	BAC	SCHW
Gross margin	56.08%	86.67%
Operating margin	24.70%	43.49%
Net margin	18.95%	33.62%
ROE	11.18%	20.24%

Dividends

Metric	BAC	SCHW
Dividend yield	1.82%	0.81%
Payout ratio	28.87%	19.44%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BAC	SCHW
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	14.65%	13.03%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	15.60%	17.05%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	11.55%	10.77%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, BAC or SCHW?: BAC has the lower trailing P/E: BAC trades at 14.21 and SCHW at 20.42. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, BAC or SCHW?: Over the past five years, BAC grew revenue faster — BAC at a 14.65% CAGR versus SCHW at 13.03%.
Does BAC or SCHW pay a bigger dividend?: BAC yields 1.82% and SCHW yields 0.81% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is BAC or SCHW more profitable?: SCHW runs the higher net margin — BAC at 18.95% versus SCHW at 33.62%.
How have BAC and SCHW total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, BAC delivered 17.60% and SCHW delivered 15.40% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BAC analysis Full SCHW analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Bank of America P/E ratio Charles Schwab P/E ratio Bank of America dividend yield Charles Schwab dividend yield Bank of America ROE Charles Schwab ROE Bank of America operating margin Charles Schwab operating margin Bank of America revenue growth Charles Schwab revenue growth

Bank of America & Charles Schwab appear in these rankings

Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 23, 2026.