Is AZO or CVNA cheaper?

On trailing earnings, AZO is cheaper: AZO trades at a 21.07 P/E and CVNA at 33.38.

Which has grown faster, AZO or CVNA?

Over the past five years, CVNA grew revenue faster — AZO at a 6.98% CAGR versus CVNA at 27.32%.

Is AZO or CVNA more profitable?

AZO runs the higher net margin — AZO at 12.40% versus CVNA at 7.09%.

Which has been the better investment, AZO or CVNA?

Over the past 5-year, AZO delivered the higher annualized total return — AZO at 15.18% versus CVNA at 2.49%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

AutoZone, Inc. (AZO) vs Carvana Co. (CVNA)

AZO leads on 8 of 12 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of AutoZone, Inc. and Carvana Co. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 19, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

AZO

AutoZone, Inc.

$50.16B

$3064.48Consumer Cyclical

CVNA

Carvana Co.

$72.99B

$66.56Consumer Cyclical

Total return — AZO vs CVNA

growth of $100 · last 9y

AZO +342.7%CVNA +2898.2%CVNA compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

AZO CVNA

AZO vs CVNA: by the numbers

•CVNA is the larger company ($72.99B vs $50.16B market cap).
•AZO trades at the lower earnings multiple (21.07 vs 33.38 P/E).
•AZO converts more revenue to profit (12.40% vs 7.09% net margin).
•CVNA grew revenue faster over the past five years (27.32% vs 6.98% CAGR).

Which is better, AZO or CVNA?

Metric tally: AZO 8 · CVNA 4

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueAZO(lower P/E)

GrowthCVNA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityAZO(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	AZO	CVNA
P/E ratio	21.07●	33.38
Forward P/E	17.45●	32.01
P/S ratio	2.58	2.19●
P/B ratio	—	13.25
PEG ratio	1.39	0.08●
EV / EBITDA	15.01	—
FCF yield	3.16%●	1.50%

Profitability

Metric	AZO	CVNA
Gross margin	51.75%●	19.97%
Operating margin	18.02%●	9.19%
Net margin	12.40%●	7.09%
ROE	-73.17%	42.90%●
ROIC	28.13%●	-33.63%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AZO	CVNA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.98%	27.32%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	15.11%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-11.96%	—
Total return CAGR (5Y)	17.20%●	2.49%

Frequently asked

Which is better, AZO or CVNA?: It depends on your goal. value: AZO (lower P/E); growth: CVNA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: AZO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, AZO leads 8 to 4.
Is AZO or CVNA cheaper?: On trailing earnings, AZO is cheaper: AZO trades at a 21.07 P/E and CVNA at 33.38.
Which has grown faster, AZO or CVNA?: Over the past five years, CVNA grew revenue faster — AZO at a 6.98% CAGR versus CVNA at 27.32%.
Is AZO or CVNA more profitable?: AZO runs the higher net margin — AZO at 12.40% versus CVNA at 7.09%.
Which has been the better investment, AZO or CVNA?: Over the past 5-year, AZO delivered the higher annualized total return — AZO at 15.18% versus CVNA at 2.49%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AZO analysis Full CVNA analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

AutoZone P/E ratio Carvana P/E ratio AutoZone dividend yield Carvana dividend yield AutoZone ROE Carvana ROE AutoZone operating margin Carvana operating margin AutoZone revenue growth Carvana revenue growth AutoZone free cash flow Carvana free cash flow

AutoZone & Carvana appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 19, 2026.