AstraZeneca PLC (AZN) vs Seagate Technology Holdings plc (STX)
AZN leads on 10 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of AstraZeneca PLC and Seagate Technology Holdings plc across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
AZN
AstraZeneca PLC
$178.75Healthcare
STX
Seagate Technology Holdings plc
$931.04Technology
Total return — AZN vs STX
growth of $100 · last 24yAZN +400.0%STX +7996.0%STX compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
AZN STX
AZN vs STX: by the numbers
- •AZN is the larger company ($277.22B vs $208.77B market cap).
- •AZN trades at the lower earnings multiple (26.92 vs 88.33 P/E).
- •STX converts more revenue to profit (21.60% vs 17.19% net margin).
- •AZN grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.99% vs 1.57% CAGR).
- •AZN pays the higher dividend yield (1.79% vs 0.31%).
Which is better, AZN or STX?
Metric tally: AZN 10 · STX 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueAZN(lower P/E)
GrowthAZN(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeAZN(higher dividend yield)
QualitySTX(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AZN | STX |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 26.92● | 88.33 |
| Forward P/E | 15.33● | 34.14 |
| P/S ratio | 4.62● | 19.36 |
| P/B ratio | 5.90● | 194.71 |
| PEG ratio | 0.14 | 0.06● |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.92● | 65.31 |
| FCF yield | 2.89%● | 1.23% |
Profitability
| Metric | AZN | STX |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 81.68%● | 41.54% |
| Operating margin | 23.69% | 28.33%● |
| Net margin | 17.19% | 21.60%● |
| ROE | 21.95% | 217.17%● |
| ROIC | 13.03% | 34.14%● |
Dividends
| Metric | AZN | STX |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.79%● | 0.31% |
| Payout ratio | 48.48% | 42.14% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AZN | STX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 16.99%● | 1.57% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 22.02%● | -0.47% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 15.68% | 20.22%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 11.03% | 61.98%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AZN or STX?
- It depends on your goal. value: AZN (lower P/E); growth: AZN (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: AZN (higher dividend yield); quality: STX (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, AZN leads 10 to 7.
- Is AZN or STX cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, AZN is cheaper: AZN trades at a 26.92 P/E and STX at 88.33.
- Which has grown faster, AZN or STX?
- Over the past five years, AZN grew revenue faster — AZN at a 16.99% CAGR versus STX at 1.57%.
- Does AZN or STX pay a bigger dividend?
- AZN yields 1.79% and STX yields 0.31% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is AZN or STX more profitable?
- STX runs the higher net margin — AZN at 17.19% versus STX at 21.60%.
- Which has been the better investment, AZN or STX?
- Over the past 10-year, STX delivered the higher annualized total return — AZN at 15.77% versus STX at 50.80%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
AstraZeneca P/E ratioSeagate Technology P/E ratioAstraZeneca dividend yieldSeagate Technology dividend yieldAstraZeneca ROESeagate Technology ROEAstraZeneca operating marginSeagate Technology operating marginAstraZeneca revenue growthSeagate Technology revenue growthAstraZeneca free cash flowSeagate Technology free cash flow
AstraZeneca & Seagate Technology appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.