Is AZN or RTX cheaper?

On trailing earnings, AZN is cheaper: AZN trades at a 26.92 P/E and RTX at 34.43.

Which has grown faster, AZN or RTX?

Over the past five years, AZN grew revenue faster — AZN at a 16.99% CAGR versus RTX at 8.37%.

Does AZN or RTX pay a bigger dividend?

AZN yields 1.79% and RTX yields 1.51% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is AZN or RTX more profitable?

AZN runs the higher net margin — AZN at 17.19% versus RTX at 8.03%.

Which has been the better investment, AZN or RTX?

Over the past 10-year, AZN delivered the higher annualized total return — AZN at 15.77% versus RTX at 14.46%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

AstraZeneca PLC (AZN) vs RTX Corporation (RTX)

AZN leads on 12 of 17 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of AstraZeneca PLC and RTX Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — AZN vs RTX

growth of $100 · last 30y

AZN +732.9%RTX +2154.7%RTX compounded faster

AZN RTX

AZN vs RTX: by the numbers

•AZN is the larger company ($277.22B vs $247.16B market cap).
•AZN trades at the lower earnings multiple (26.92 vs 34.43 P/E).
•AZN converts more revenue to profit (17.19% vs 8.03% net margin).
•AZN grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.99% vs 8.37% CAGR).
•AZN pays the higher dividend yield (1.79% vs 1.51%).

Which is better, AZN or RTX?

Metric tally: AZN 12 · RTX 5

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueAZN(lower P/E)

GrowthAZN(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeAZN(higher dividend yield)

QualityAZN(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	AZN	RTX
P/E ratio	26.92●	34.43
Forward P/E	15.33●	24.07
P/S ratio	4.62	2.77●
P/B ratio	5.90	3.78●
PEG ratio	0.14●	0.91
EV / EBITDA	14.92●	18.31
FCF yield	2.89%	3.34%●

Profitability

Metric	AZN	RTX
Gross margin	81.68%●	20.21%
Operating margin	23.69%●	10.87%
Net margin	17.19%●	8.03%
ROE	21.95%●	10.95%
ROIC	13.03%●	6.49%

Dividends

Metric	AZN	RTX
Dividend yield	1.79%●	1.51%
Payout ratio	48.48%	55.18%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AZN	RTX
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	16.99%●	8.37%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	22.02%●	-4.16%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	15.68%	37.83%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	11.03%	18.19%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, AZN or RTX?: It depends on your goal. value: AZN (lower P/E); growth: AZN (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: AZN (higher dividend yield); quality: AZN (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, AZN leads 12 to 5.
Is AZN or RTX cheaper?: On trailing earnings, AZN is cheaper: AZN trades at a 26.92 P/E and RTX at 34.43.
Which has grown faster, AZN or RTX?: Over the past five years, AZN grew revenue faster — AZN at a 16.99% CAGR versus RTX at 8.37%.
Does AZN or RTX pay a bigger dividend?: AZN yields 1.79% and RTX yields 1.51% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is AZN or RTX more profitable?: AZN runs the higher net margin — AZN at 17.19% versus RTX at 8.03%.
Which has been the better investment, AZN or RTX?: Over the past 10-year, AZN delivered the higher annualized total return — AZN at 15.77% versus RTX at 14.46%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AZN analysis Full RTX analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

AstraZeneca P/E ratio RTX P/E ratio AstraZeneca dividend yield RTX dividend yield AstraZeneca ROE RTX ROE AstraZeneca operating margin RTX operating margin AstraZeneca revenue growth RTX revenue growth AstraZeneca free cash flow RTX free cash flow

AstraZeneca & RTX appear in these rankings

Dividend Aristocrats Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks Largest Companies by Market Cap

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.