AstraZeneca PLC (AZN) vs Eaton Corporation plc (ETN)
AZN leads on 13 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of AstraZeneca PLC and Eaton Corporation plc across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — AZN vs ETN
growth of $100 · last 30yAZN +732.9%ETN +2981.8%ETN compounded faster
AZN ETN
AZN vs ETN: by the numbers
- •AZN is the larger company ($277.22B vs $151.98B market cap).
- •AZN trades at the lower earnings multiple (26.92 vs 38.26 P/E).
- •AZN converts more revenue to profit (17.19% vs 13.99% net margin).
- •AZN grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.99% vs 9.94% CAGR).
- •AZN pays the higher dividend yield (1.79% vs 1.09%).
Which is better, AZN or ETN?
Metric tally: AZN 13 · ETN 3It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueAZN(lower P/E)
GrowthAZN(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeAZN(higher dividend yield)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AZN | ETN |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 26.92● | 38.26 |
| Forward P/E | 15.33● | 24.99 |
| P/S ratio | 4.62● | 5.34 |
| P/B ratio | 5.90● | 7.71 |
| PEG ratio | 0.14● | 3.04 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.92● | 27.86 |
| FCF yield | 2.89% | 3.08%● |
Profitability
| Metric | AZN | ETN |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 81.68%● | 36.89% |
| Operating margin | 23.69%● | 18.13% |
| Net margin | 17.19%● | 13.99% |
| ROE | 21.95%● | 20.19% |
| ROIC | 13.03% | 13.14% |
Dividends
| Metric | AZN | ETN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.79%● | 1.09% |
| Payout ratio | 48.48% | 40.80% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AZN | ETN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 16.99%● | 9.94% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 22.02% | 24.48%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 15.68%● | 13.57% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 11.03% | 23.64%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AZN or ETN?
- It depends on your goal. value: AZN (lower P/E); growth: AZN (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: AZN (higher dividend yield). Across all compared metrics, AZN leads 13 to 3.
- Is AZN or ETN cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, AZN is cheaper: AZN trades at a 26.92 P/E and ETN at 38.26.
- Which has grown faster, AZN or ETN?
- Over the past five years, AZN grew revenue faster — AZN at a 16.99% CAGR versus ETN at 9.94%.
- Does AZN or ETN pay a bigger dividend?
- AZN yields 1.79% and ETN yields 1.09% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is AZN or ETN more profitable?
- AZN runs the higher net margin — AZN at 17.19% versus ETN at 13.99%.
- Which has been the better investment, AZN or ETN?
- Over the past 10-year, ETN delivered the higher annualized total return — AZN at 15.77% versus ETN at 23.24%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
AstraZeneca P/E ratioEaton P/E ratioAstraZeneca dividend yieldEaton dividend yieldAstraZeneca ROEEaton ROEAstraZeneca operating marginEaton operating marginAstraZeneca revenue growthEaton revenue growthAstraZeneca free cash flowEaton free cash flow
AstraZeneca & Eaton appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.