Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) vs Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST)
AVGO leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics, though MNST is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Broadcom Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
$382.07Technology
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
$92.83Consumer Defensive
Total return — AVGO vs MNST
growth of $100 · last 17yAVGO +23484.6%MNST +3403.0%AVGO compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
AVGO MNST
AVGO vs MNST: by the numbers
- •AVGO is the larger company ($1.82T vs $90.79B market cap).
- •MNST trades at the lower earnings multiple (44.85 vs 63.68 P/E).
- •AVGO converts more revenue to profit (38.85% vs 23.11% net margin).
- •AVGO grew revenue faster over the past five years (24.17% vs 12.96% CAGR).
- •AVGO pays a dividend (0.65% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.
Which is better, AVGO or MNST?
Metric tally: AVGO 10 · MNST 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueMNST(lower P/E)
GrowthAVGO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityMNST(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AVGO | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 63.68 | 44.85● |
| Forward P/E | 19.68● | 35.95 |
| P/S ratio | 24.69 | 10.43● |
| P/B ratio | 21.24 | 10.51● |
| PEG ratio | 0.26● | 1.31 |
| EV / EBITDA | 45.41 | 32.31● |
| FCF yield | 1.76% | 2.26%● |
Profitability
| Metric | AVGO | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 66.96%● | 55.47% |
| Operating margin | 43.66%● | 29.34% |
| Net margin | 38.85%● | 23.11% |
| ROE | 33.43%● | 23.28% |
| ROIC | 16.36% | 21.74%● |
Dividends
| Metric | AVGO | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.65% | — |
| Payout ratio | 50.51% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AVGO | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 24.17%● | 12.96% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 49.36%● | 7.95% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 20.74%● | 10.53% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 55.05%● | 14.70% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AVGO or MNST?
- It depends on your goal. value: MNST (lower P/E); growth: AVGO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: MNST (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, AVGO leads 10 to 6.
- Is AVGO or MNST cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, MNST is cheaper: AVGO trades at a 63.68 P/E and MNST at 44.85.
- Which has grown faster, AVGO or MNST?
- Over the past five years, AVGO grew revenue faster — AVGO at a 24.17% CAGR versus MNST at 12.96%.
- Does AVGO or MNST pay a bigger dividend?
- AVGO pays a dividend (0.65% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.
- Is AVGO or MNST more profitable?
- AVGO runs the higher net margin — AVGO at 38.85% versus MNST at 23.11%.
- Which has been the better investment, AVGO or MNST?
- Over the past 10-year, AVGO delivered the higher annualized total return — AVGO at 40.78% versus MNST at 13.75%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Broadcom P/E ratioMonster Beverage P/E ratioBroadcom dividend yieldMonster Beverage dividend yieldBroadcom ROEMonster Beverage ROEBroadcom operating marginMonster Beverage operating marginBroadcom revenue growthMonster Beverage revenue growthBroadcom free cash flowMonster Beverage free cash flow
Broadcom & Monster Beverage appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.