Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) vs Humana Inc. (HUM)
AVGO leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics, though HUM is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Broadcom Inc. and Humana Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — AVGO vs HUM
growth of $100 · last 17yAVGO +23484.6%HUM +1059.0%AVGO compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
AVGO HUM
AVGO vs HUM: by the numbers
- •AVGO is the larger company ($1.82T vs $45.53B market cap).
- •HUM trades at the lower earnings multiple (40.56 vs 63.68 P/E).
- •AVGO converts more revenue to profit (38.85% vs 0.82% net margin).
- •AVGO grew revenue faster over the past five years (24.17% vs 11.71% CAGR).
- •HUM pays the higher dividend yield (0.93% vs 0.65%).
Which is better, AVGO or HUM?
Metric tally: AVGO 10 · HUM 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueHUM(lower P/E)
GrowthAVGO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeHUM(higher dividend yield)
QualityAVGO(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AVGO | HUM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 63.68 | 40.56● |
| Forward P/E | 19.68● | 23.94 |
| P/S ratio | 24.69 | 0.33● |
| P/B ratio | 21.24 | 2.46● |
| PEG ratio | 0.26 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 45.41 | 19.22● |
| FCF yield | 1.76% | 2.78%● |
Profitability
| Metric | AVGO | HUM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 66.96%● | 14.01% |
| Operating margin | 43.66%● | 1.01% |
| Net margin | 38.85%● | 0.82% |
| ROE | 33.43%● | 6.08% |
| ROIC | 16.36%● | 3.12% |
Dividends
| Metric | AVGO | HUM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.65% | 0.93%● |
| Payout ratio | 50.51% | 35.87% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AVGO | HUM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 24.17%● | 11.71% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 49.36%● | -17.27% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 20.74%● | -17.19% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 55.05%● | -1.01% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AVGO or HUM?
- It depends on your goal. value: HUM (lower P/E); growth: AVGO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: HUM (higher dividend yield); quality: AVGO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, AVGO leads 10 to 6.
- Is AVGO or HUM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, HUM is cheaper: AVGO trades at a 63.68 P/E and HUM at 40.56.
- Which has grown faster, AVGO or HUM?
- Over the past five years, AVGO grew revenue faster — AVGO at a 24.17% CAGR versus HUM at 11.71%.
- Does AVGO or HUM pay a bigger dividend?
- AVGO yields 0.65% and HUM yields 0.93% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is AVGO or HUM more profitable?
- AVGO runs the higher net margin — AVGO at 38.85% versus HUM at 0.82%.
- Which has been the better investment, AVGO or HUM?
- Over the past 10-year, AVGO delivered the higher annualized total return — AVGO at 40.78% versus HUM at 8.24%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Broadcom P/E ratioHumana P/E ratioBroadcom dividend yieldHumana dividend yieldBroadcom ROEHumana ROEBroadcom operating marginHumana operating marginBroadcom revenue growthHumana revenue growthBroadcom free cash flowHumana free cash flow
Broadcom & Humana appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.