Which has the lower trailing P/E, ATO or ED?

ED has the lower trailing P/E: ATO trades at 18.71 and ED at 16.98. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, ATO or ED?

Over the past five years, ATO grew revenue faster — ATO at a 8.23% CAGR versus ED at 6.46%.

Does ATO or ED pay a bigger dividend?

ATO yields 2.55% and ED yields 3.40% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is ATO or ED more profitable?

ATO runs the higher net margin — ATO at 28.50% versus ED at 12.53%.

How have ATO and ED total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, ATO delivered 10.33% and ED delivered 6.98% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) vs Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED)

A side-by-side comparison of Atmos Energy Corporation and Consolidated Edison, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 4, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

ATO

Atmos Energy Corporation

$26.23B

$157.17UtilitiesDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Consolidated Edison, Inc.

$38.10B

$103.39UtilitiesDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — ATO vs ED

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

ATO +165.8% (+10.3%/yr)ED +104.9% (+7.4%/yr)ATO compounded faster over this window

ATO ED

ATO vs ED: by the numbers

•ED is the larger company ($38.10B vs $26.23B market cap).
•ED trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (16.98 vs 18.71 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•ATO converts more revenue to profit (28.50% vs 12.53% net margin).
•ATO grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.23% vs 6.46% CAGR).
•ED pays the higher dividend yield (3.40% vs 2.55%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ATO	ED
P/E ratio	18.71	16.98
Forward P/E	17.40	16.93
PEG ratio	2.12	1.48
P/S ratio	5.33	2.15
P/B ratio	1.72	1.48
EV / EBITDA	13.85	12.38

Profitability

Metric	ATO	ED
Gross margin	52.37%	62.02%
Operating margin	36.97%	17.98%
Net margin	28.50%	12.53%
ROE	9.19%	8.62%
ROIC	4.81%	3.37%

Dividends

Metric	ATO	ED
Dividend yield	2.55%	3.40%
Payout ratio	47.62%	57.68%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ATO	ED
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	8.23%	6.46%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	9.05%	11.46%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	14.89%	11.41%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, ATO or ED?: ED has the lower trailing P/E: ATO trades at 18.71 and ED at 16.98. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, ATO or ED?: Over the past five years, ATO grew revenue faster — ATO at a 8.23% CAGR versus ED at 6.46%.
Does ATO or ED pay a bigger dividend?: ATO yields 2.55% and ED yields 3.40% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is ATO or ED more profitable?: ATO runs the higher net margin — ATO at 28.50% versus ED at 12.53%.
How have ATO and ED total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, ATO delivered 10.33% and ED delivered 6.98% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ATO analysis Full ED analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Atmos Energy P/E ratio Consolidated Edison P/E ratio Atmos Energy dividend yield Consolidated Edison dividend yield Atmos Energy ROE Consolidated Edison ROE Atmos Energy operating margin Consolidated Edison operating margin Atmos Energy revenue growth Consolidated Edison revenue growth Atmos Energy free cash flow Consolidated Edison free cash flow

Atmos Energy & Consolidated Edison appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks 25+ Year Dividend Growers Highest Operating Margin Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 4, 2026.