Is ATO or ED cheaper?

On trailing earnings, ED is cheaper: ATO trades at a 20.91 P/E and ED at 18.14.

Which has grown faster, ATO or ED?

Over the past five years, ATO grew revenue faster — ATO at a 8.80% CAGR versus ED at 6.30%.

Does ATO or ED pay a bigger dividend?

ATO yields 2.28% and ED yields 3.23% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is ATO or ED more profitable?

ATO runs the higher net margin — ATO at 27.58% versus ED at 12.52%.

Which has been the better investment, ATO or ED?

Over the past 10-year, ATO delivered the higher annualized total return — ATO at 10.97% versus ED at 7.17%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) vs Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED)

ED leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Atmos Energy Corporation and Consolidated Edison, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

ATO

Atmos Energy Corporation

$28.37B

$169.96Utilities

Consolidated Edison, Inc.

$39.71B

$107.74Utilities

Total return — ATO vs ED

growth of $100 · last 30y

ATO +590.1%ED +286.4%ATO compounded faster

ATO ED

ATO vs ED: by the numbers

•ED is the larger company ($39.71B vs $28.37B market cap).
•ED trades at the lower earnings multiple (18.14 vs 20.91 P/E).
•ATO converts more revenue to profit (27.58% vs 12.52% net margin).
•ATO grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.80% vs 6.30% CAGR).
•ED pays the higher dividend yield (3.23% vs 2.28%).

Which is better, ATO or ED?

Metric tally: ATO 7 · ED 9

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueED(lower P/E)

GrowthATO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeED(higher dividend yield)

QualityATO(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	ATO	ED
P/E ratio	20.91	18.14●
Forward P/E	18.97	16.62●
P/S ratio	5.84	2.28●
P/B ratio	1.91	1.53●
PEG ratio	2.18●	2.31
EV / EBITDA	14.73	9.50●
FCF yield	—	7.17%

Profitability

Metric	ATO	ED
Gross margin	51.43%	65.01%●
Operating margin	35.87%●	17.33%
Net margin	27.58%●	12.52%
ROE	9.03%●	8.42%
ROIC	4.58%●	3.24%

Dividends

Metric	ATO	ED
Dividend yield	2.28%	3.23%●
Payout ratio	51.33%	61.40%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ATO	ED
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	8.80%●	6.30%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	9.05%	11.46%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	19.32%	47.32%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	13.57%●	10.69%

Frequently asked

Which is better, ATO or ED?: It depends on your goal. value: ED (lower P/E); growth: ATO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: ED (higher dividend yield); quality: ATO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ED leads 9 to 7.
Is ATO or ED cheaper?: On trailing earnings, ED is cheaper: ATO trades at a 20.91 P/E and ED at 18.14.
Which has grown faster, ATO or ED?: Over the past five years, ATO grew revenue faster — ATO at a 8.80% CAGR versus ED at 6.30%.
Does ATO or ED pay a bigger dividend?: ATO yields 2.28% and ED yields 3.23% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is ATO or ED more profitable?: ATO runs the higher net margin — ATO at 27.58% versus ED at 12.52%.
Which has been the better investment, ATO or ED?: Over the past 10-year, ATO delivered the higher annualized total return — ATO at 10.97% versus ED at 7.17%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ATO analysis Full ED analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Atmos Energy P/E ratio Consolidated Edison P/E ratio Atmos Energy dividend yield Consolidated Edison dividend yield Atmos Energy ROE Consolidated Edison ROE Atmos Energy operating margin Consolidated Edison operating margin Atmos Energy revenue growth Consolidated Edison revenue growth Atmos Energy free cash flow Consolidated Edison free cash flow

Atmos Energy & Consolidated Edison appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Dividend Aristocrats Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.