Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) vs Teradyne, Inc. (TER)
APO leads on 10 of 14 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Apollo Global Management, Inc. and Teradyne, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
$133.88Financial Services
TER
Teradyne, Inc.
$403.20Technology
Total return — APO vs TER
growth of $100 · last 15yAPO +657.4%TER +2303.1%TER compounded faster
APO TER
APO vs TER: by the numbers
- •APO is the larger company ($79.41B vs $67.54B market cap).
- •APO trades at the lower earnings multiple (40.08 vs 74.67 P/E).
- •TER converts more revenue to profit (22.55% vs 7.24% net margin).
- •APO grew revenue faster over the past five years (37.15% vs 3.76% CAGR).
- •APO pays the higher dividend yield (1.56% vs 0.12%).
Which is better, APO or TER?
Metric tally: APO 10 · TER 4It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueAPO(lower P/E)
GrowthAPO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeAPO(higher dividend yield)
QualityTER(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | APO | TER |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 40.08● | 74.67 |
| Forward P/E | 14.99● | 54.71 |
| P/S ratio | 2.68● | 16.78 |
| P/B ratio | 3.99● | 20.22 |
| PEG ratio | 0.53● | 23.29 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 57.36 |
| FCF yield | — | 0.87% |
Profitability
| Metric | APO | TER |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 89.33%● | 58.79% |
| Operating margin | 31.05%● | 26.92% |
| Net margin | 7.24% | 22.55%● |
| ROE | 10.78% | 27.17%● |
| ROIC | 7.24% | 18.45%● |
Dividends
| Metric | APO | TER |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.56%● | 0.12% |
| Payout ratio | 28.63% | 14.33% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | APO | TER |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 37.15%● | 3.76% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 75.44%● | -5.86% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | — | -3.97% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 21.35% | 27.57%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, APO or TER?
- It depends on your goal. value: APO (lower P/E); growth: APO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: APO (higher dividend yield); quality: TER (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, APO leads 10 to 4.
- Is APO or TER cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, APO is cheaper: APO trades at a 40.08 P/E and TER at 74.67.
- Which has grown faster, APO or TER?
- Over the past five years, APO grew revenue faster — APO at a 37.15% CAGR versus TER at 3.76%.
- Does APO or TER pay a bigger dividend?
- APO yields 1.56% and TER yields 0.12% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is APO or TER more profitable?
- TER runs the higher net margin — APO at 7.24% versus TER at 22.55%.
- Which has been the better investment, APO or TER?
- Over the past 10-year, TER delivered the higher annualized total return — APO at 29.59% versus TER at 37.09%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Apollo Global Management P/E ratioTeradyne P/E ratioApollo Global Management dividend yieldTeradyne dividend yieldApollo Global Management ROETeradyne ROEApollo Global Management operating marginTeradyne operating marginApollo Global Management revenue growthTeradyne revenue growthApollo Global Management free cash flowTeradyne free cash flow
Apollo Global Management & Teradyne appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.