Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) vs The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW)
APO leads on 10 of 14 compared metrics, though SHW is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Apollo Global Management, Inc. and The Sherwin-Williams Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
$133.88Financial Services
SHW
The Sherwin-Williams Company
$317.30Basic Materials
Total return — APO vs SHW
growth of $100 · last 15yAPO +635.6%SHW +1030.8%SHW compounded faster
APO SHW
APO vs SHW: by the numbers
- •APO is the larger company ($79.41B vs $78.26B market cap).
- •SHW trades at the lower earnings multiple (30.45 vs 40.08 P/E).
- •SHW converts more revenue to profit (10.86% vs 7.24% net margin).
- •APO grew revenue faster over the past five years (37.15% vs 4.87% CAGR).
- •APO pays the higher dividend yield (1.56% vs 1.00%).
Which is better, APO or SHW?
Metric tally: APO 10 · SHW 4It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSHW(lower P/E)
GrowthAPO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeAPO(higher dividend yield)
QualitySHW(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | APO | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 40.08 | 30.45● |
| Forward P/E | 14.99● | 27.07 |
| P/S ratio | 2.68● | 3.29 |
| P/B ratio | 3.99● | 17.77 |
| PEG ratio | 0.53● | 4.52 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 20.64 |
| FCF yield | — | 3.69% |
Profitability
| Metric | APO | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 89.33%● | 49.12% |
| Operating margin | 31.05%● | 16.13% |
| Net margin | 7.24% | 10.86%● |
| ROE | 10.78% | 58.66%● |
| ROIC | 7.24% | 15.21%● |
Dividends
| Metric | APO | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.56%● | 1.00% |
| Payout ratio | 28.63% | 30.64% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | APO | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 37.15%● | 4.87% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 75.44%● | 6.74% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | — | -2.44% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 21.35%● | 3.70% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, APO or SHW?
- It depends on your goal. value: SHW (lower P/E); growth: APO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: APO (higher dividend yield); quality: SHW (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, APO leads 10 to 4.
- Is APO or SHW cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, SHW is cheaper: APO trades at a 40.08 P/E and SHW at 30.45.
- Which has grown faster, APO or SHW?
- Over the past five years, APO grew revenue faster — APO at a 37.15% CAGR versus SHW at 4.87%.
- Does APO or SHW pay a bigger dividend?
- APO yields 1.56% and SHW yields 1.00% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is APO or SHW more profitable?
- SHW runs the higher net margin — APO at 7.24% versus SHW at 10.86%.
- Which has been the better investment, APO or SHW?
- Over the past 10-year, APO delivered the higher annualized total return — APO at 29.59% versus SHW at 13.58%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Apollo Global Management P/E ratioSherwin-Williams P/E ratioApollo Global Management dividend yieldSherwin-Williams dividend yieldApollo Global Management ROESherwin-Williams ROEApollo Global Management operating marginSherwin-Williams operating marginApollo Global Management revenue growthSherwin-Williams revenue growthApollo Global Management free cash flowSherwin-Williams free cash flow
Apollo Global Management & Sherwin-Williams appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.