Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) vs Phillips 66 (PSX)
APO and PSX are evenly matched — 7 metrics each of 14.
A side-by-side comparison of Apollo Global Management, Inc. and Phillips 66 across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — APO vs PSX
growth of $100 · last 14yAPO +866.6%PSX +427.8%APO compounded faster
APO PSX
APO vs PSX: by the numbers
- •APO is the larger company ($79.41B vs $71.95B market cap).
- •PSX trades at the lower earnings multiple (17.68 vs 40.08 P/E).
- •APO converts more revenue to profit (7.24% vs 3.04% net margin).
- •APO grew revenue faster over the past five years (37.15% vs 15.79% CAGR).
- •PSX pays the higher dividend yield (2.75% vs 1.56%).
Which is better, APO or PSX?
Metric tally: APO 7 · PSX 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValuePSX(lower P/E)
GrowthAPO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomePSX(higher dividend yield)
QualityAPO(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | APO | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 40.08 | 17.68● |
| Forward P/E | 14.99 | 10.44● |
| P/S ratio | 2.68 | 0.53● |
| P/B ratio | 3.99 | 2.54● |
| PEG ratio | 0.53 | 0.10● |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 10.27 |
| FCF yield | — | 0.16% |
Profitability
| Metric | APO | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 89.33%● | 7.04% |
| Operating margin | 31.05%● | 4.67% |
| Net margin | 7.24%● | 3.04% |
| ROE | 10.78% | 14.45%● |
| ROIC | 7.24%● | 4.75% |
Dividends
| Metric | APO | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.56% | 2.75%● |
| Payout ratio | 28.63% | 45.57% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | APO | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 37.15%● | 15.79% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 75.44%● | 8.08% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | — | -16.26% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 21.35%● | 18.98% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, APO or PSX?
- It depends on your goal. value: PSX (lower P/E); growth: APO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: PSX (higher dividend yield); quality: APO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
- Is APO or PSX cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, PSX is cheaper: APO trades at a 40.08 P/E and PSX at 17.68.
- Which has grown faster, APO or PSX?
- Over the past five years, APO grew revenue faster — APO at a 37.15% CAGR versus PSX at 15.79%.
- Does APO or PSX pay a bigger dividend?
- APO yields 1.56% and PSX yields 2.75% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is APO or PSX more profitable?
- APO runs the higher net margin — APO at 7.24% versus PSX at 3.04%.
- Which has been the better investment, APO or PSX?
- Over the past 10-year, APO delivered the higher annualized total return — APO at 29.59% versus PSX at 12.55%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Apollo Global Management P/E ratioPhillips 66 P/E ratioApollo Global Management dividend yieldPhillips 66 dividend yieldApollo Global Management ROEPhillips 66 ROEApollo Global Management operating marginPhillips 66 operating marginApollo Global Management revenue growthPhillips 66 revenue growthApollo Global Management free cash flowPhillips 66 free cash flow
Apollo Global Management & Phillips 66 appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.