Is APO or PSA cheaper?

On trailing earnings, PSA is cheaper: APO trades at a 40.08 P/E and PSA at 33.64.

Which has grown faster, APO or PSA?

Over the past five years, APO grew revenue faster — APO at a 37.15% CAGR versus PSA at 10.32%.

Does APO or PSA pay a bigger dividend?

APO yields 1.56% and PSA yields 3.68% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is APO or PSA more profitable?

PSA runs the higher net margin — APO at 7.24% versus PSA at 39.16%.

Which has been the better investment, APO or PSA?

Over the past 10-year, APO delivered the higher annualized total return — APO at 29.59% versus PSA at 6.79%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) vs Public Storage (PSA)

APO leads on 8 of 14 compared metrics, though PSA is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of Apollo Global Management, Inc. and Public Storage across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

APO

Apollo Global Management, Inc.

$79.41B

$133.88Financial Services

Total return — APO vs PSA

growth of $100 · last 15y

APO +635.6%PSA +195.5%APO compounded faster

APO PSA

APO vs PSA: by the numbers

•APO is the larger company ($79.41B vs $57.22B market cap).
•PSA trades at the lower earnings multiple (33.64 vs 40.08 P/E).
•PSA converts more revenue to profit (39.16% vs 7.24% net margin).
•APO grew revenue faster over the past five years (37.15% vs 10.32% CAGR).
•PSA pays the higher dividend yield (3.68% vs 1.56%).

Which is better, APO or PSA?

Metric tally: APO 8 · PSA 6

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValuePSA(lower P/E)

GrowthAPO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomePSA(higher dividend yield)

QualityPSA(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	APO	PSA
P/E ratio	40.08	33.64●
Forward P/E	14.99●	33.01
P/S ratio	2.68●	11.80
P/B ratio	3.99●	6.22
PEG ratio	0.53●	4.47
EV / EBITDA	—	20.76

Profitability

Metric	APO	PSA
Gross margin	89.33%●	60.63%
Operating margin	31.05%	50.85%●
Net margin	7.24%	39.16%●
ROE	10.78%	20.63%●
ROIC	7.24%	11.50%●

Dividends

Metric	APO	PSA
Dividend yield	1.56%	3.68%●
Payout ratio	28.63%	132.74%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	APO	PSA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	37.15%●	10.32%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	75.44%●	7.52%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	21.35%●	5.63%

Frequently asked

Which is better, APO or PSA?: It depends on your goal. value: PSA (lower P/E); growth: APO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: PSA (higher dividend yield); quality: PSA (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, APO leads 8 to 6.
Is APO or PSA cheaper?: On trailing earnings, PSA is cheaper: APO trades at a 40.08 P/E and PSA at 33.64.
Which has grown faster, APO or PSA?: Over the past five years, APO grew revenue faster — APO at a 37.15% CAGR versus PSA at 10.32%.
Does APO or PSA pay a bigger dividend?: APO yields 1.56% and PSA yields 3.68% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is APO or PSA more profitable?: PSA runs the higher net margin — APO at 7.24% versus PSA at 39.16%.
Which has been the better investment, APO or PSA?: Over the past 10-year, APO delivered the higher annualized total return — APO at 29.59% versus PSA at 6.79%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full APO analysis Full PSA analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Apollo Global Management P/E ratio Public Storage P/E ratio Apollo Global Management dividend yield Public Storage dividend yield Apollo Global Management ROE Public Storage ROE Apollo Global Management operating margin Public Storage operating margin Apollo Global Management revenue growth Public Storage revenue growth Apollo Global Management free cash flow Public Storage free cash flow

Apollo Global Management & Public Storage appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.