Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) vs Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MRSH)
APO leads on 9 of 14 compared metrics, though MRSH is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Apollo Global Management, Inc. and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 16, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
$136.11Financial Services
MRSH
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
$166.78Financial Services
Total return — APO vs MRSH
growth of $100 · last 15yAPO +657.4%MRSH +458.9%APO compounded faster
APO MRSH
APO vs MRSH: by the numbers
- •MRSH is the larger company ($80.35B vs $79.70B market cap).
- •MRSH trades at the lower earnings multiple (20.85 vs 40.75 P/E).
- •MRSH converts more revenue to profit (14.26% vs 7.24% net margin).
- •APO grew revenue faster over the past five years (37.15% vs 9.28% CAGR).
- •MRSH pays the higher dividend yield (2.16% vs 1.54%).
Which is better, APO or MRSH?
Metric tally: APO 9 · MRSH 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueMRSH(lower P/E)
GrowthAPO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeMRSH(higher dividend yield)
QualityMRSH(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | APO | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 40.75 | 20.85● |
| Forward P/E | 15.24● | 16.03 |
| P/S ratio | 2.73● | 2.95 |
| P/B ratio | 4.06● | 5.56 |
| PEG ratio | 0.54● | 7.79 |
Profitability
| Metric | APO | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 89.33%● | 42.37% |
| Operating margin | 31.05%● | 21.70% |
| Net margin | 7.24% | 14.26%● |
| ROE | 10.78% | 26.94%● |
| ROIC | 7.24% | 12.12%● |
Dividends
| Metric | APO | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.54% | 2.16%● |
| Payout ratio | 28.63% | 42.45% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | APO | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 37.15%● | 9.28% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 75.44%● | 16.34% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 21.12%● | 5.19% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, APO or MRSH?
- It depends on your goal. value: MRSH (lower P/E); growth: APO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MRSH (higher dividend yield); quality: MRSH (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, APO leads 9 to 5.
- Is APO or MRSH cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, MRSH is cheaper: APO trades at a 40.75 P/E and MRSH at 20.85.
- Which has grown faster, APO or MRSH?
- Over the past five years, APO grew revenue faster — APO at a 37.15% CAGR versus MRSH at 9.28%.
- Does APO or MRSH pay a bigger dividend?
- APO yields 1.54% and MRSH yields 2.16% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is APO or MRSH more profitable?
- MRSH runs the higher net margin — APO at 7.24% versus MRSH at 14.26%.
- Which has been the better investment, APO or MRSH?
- Over the past 10-year, APO delivered the higher annualized total return — APO at 29.52% versus MRSH at 11.57%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Apollo Global Management P/E ratioMarsh & McLennan Companies P/E ratioApollo Global Management dividend yieldMarsh & McLennan Companies dividend yieldApollo Global Management ROEMarsh & McLennan Companies ROEApollo Global Management operating marginMarsh & McLennan Companies operating marginApollo Global Management revenue growthMarsh & McLennan Companies revenue growthApollo Global Management free cash flowMarsh & McLennan Companies free cash flow
Apollo Global Management & Marsh & McLennan Companies appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 16, 2026.