Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) vs Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR)
APO leads on 10 of 14 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Apollo Global Management, Inc. and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
$133.88Financial Services
MPWR
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
$1577.32Technology
Total return — APO vs MPWR
growth of $100 · last 15yAPO +635.6%MPWR +10914.8%MPWR compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
APO MPWR
APO vs MPWR: by the numbers
- •APO is the larger company ($79.41B vs $77.49B market cap).
- •APO trades at the lower earnings multiple (40.08 vs 113.72 P/E).
- •MPWR converts more revenue to profit (22.84% vs 7.24% net margin).
- •APO grew revenue faster over the past five years (37.15% vs 25.95% CAGR).
- •APO pays the higher dividend yield (1.56% vs 0.42%).
Which is better, APO or MPWR?
Metric tally: APO 10 · MPWR 4It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueAPO(lower P/E)
GrowthAPO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeAPO(higher dividend yield)
QualityMPWR(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | APO | MPWR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 40.08● | 113.72 |
| Forward P/E | 14.99● | 52.57 |
| P/S ratio | 2.68● | 26.27 |
| P/B ratio | 3.99● | 21.12 |
| PEG ratio | 0.53● | 4.00 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 87.05 |
| FCF yield | — | 0.81% |
Profitability
| Metric | APO | MPWR |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 89.33%● | 55.18% |
| Operating margin | 31.05%● | 27.09% |
| Net margin | 7.24% | 22.84%● |
| ROE | 10.78% | 18.37%● |
| ROIC | 7.24% | 15.30%● |
Dividends
| Metric | APO | MPWR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.56%● | 0.42% |
| Payout ratio | 28.63% | 52.11% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | APO | MPWR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 37.15%● | 25.95% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 75.44%● | 28.43% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | — | 22.36% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 21.35% | 36.32%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, APO or MPWR?
- It depends on your goal. value: APO (lower P/E); growth: APO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: APO (higher dividend yield); quality: MPWR (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, APO leads 10 to 4.
- Is APO or MPWR cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, APO is cheaper: APO trades at a 40.08 P/E and MPWR at 113.72.
- Which has grown faster, APO or MPWR?
- Over the past five years, APO grew revenue faster — APO at a 37.15% CAGR versus MPWR at 25.95%.
- Does APO or MPWR pay a bigger dividend?
- APO yields 1.56% and MPWR yields 0.42% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is APO or MPWR more profitable?
- MPWR runs the higher net margin — APO at 7.24% versus MPWR at 22.84%.
- Which has been the better investment, APO or MPWR?
- Over the past 10-year, MPWR delivered the higher annualized total return — APO at 29.59% versus MPWR at 37.85%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Apollo Global Management P/E ratioMonolithic Power Systems P/E ratioApollo Global Management dividend yieldMonolithic Power Systems dividend yieldApollo Global Management ROEMonolithic Power Systems ROEApollo Global Management operating marginMonolithic Power Systems operating marginApollo Global Management revenue growthMonolithic Power Systems revenue growthApollo Global Management free cash flowMonolithic Power Systems free cash flow
Apollo Global Management & Monolithic Power Systems appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.