Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) vs Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC)
APO leads on 9 of 14 compared metrics, though MMC is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Apollo Global Management, Inc. and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 16, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
$136.11Financial Services
MMC
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
$171.14Financial Services
Total return — APO vs MMC
growth of $100 · last 15yAPO +636.0%MMC +473.5%APO compounded faster
APO MMC
APO vs MMC: by the numbers
- •MMC is the larger company ($89.82B vs $79.70B market cap).
- •MMC trades at the lower earnings multiple (20.30 vs 40.75 P/E).
- •MMC converts more revenue to profit (14.26% vs 7.24% net margin).
- •APO grew revenue faster over the past five years (37.15% vs 9.28% CAGR).
- •MMC pays the higher dividend yield (2.10% vs 1.54%).
Which is better, APO or MMC?
Metric tally: APO 9 · MMC 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueMMC(lower P/E)
GrowthAPO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeMMC(higher dividend yield)
QualityMMC(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | APO | MMC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 40.75 | 20.30● |
| Forward P/E | 15.24● | 16.60 |
| P/S ratio | 2.73● | 3.11 |
| P/B ratio | 4.06● | 5.48 |
| PEG ratio | 0.54● | 7.85 |
Profitability
| Metric | APO | MMC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 89.33%● | 20.12% |
| Operating margin | 31.05%● | 21.70% |
| Net margin | 7.24% | 14.26%● |
| ROE | 10.78% | 26.51%● |
| ROIC | 7.24% | 12.12%● |
Dividends
| Metric | APO | MMC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.54% | 2.10%● |
| Payout ratio | 28.63% | 42.45% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | APO | MMC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 37.15%● | 9.28% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 75.44%● | 16.34% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 21.12%● | 10.12% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, APO or MMC?
- It depends on your goal. value: MMC (lower P/E); growth: APO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MMC (higher dividend yield); quality: MMC (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, APO leads 9 to 5.
- Is APO or MMC cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, MMC is cheaper: APO trades at a 40.75 P/E and MMC at 20.30.
- Which has grown faster, APO or MMC?
- Over the past five years, APO grew revenue faster — APO at a 37.15% CAGR versus MMC at 9.28%.
- Does APO or MMC pay a bigger dividend?
- APO yields 1.54% and MMC yields 2.10% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is APO or MMC more profitable?
- MMC runs the higher net margin — APO at 7.24% versus MMC at 14.26%.
- Which has been the better investment, APO or MMC?
- Over the past 10-year, APO delivered the higher annualized total return — APO at 29.52% versus MMC at 13.86%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Apollo Global Management P/E ratioMarsh & McLennan Companies P/E ratioApollo Global Management dividend yieldMarsh & McLennan Companies dividend yieldApollo Global Management ROEMarsh & McLennan Companies ROEApollo Global Management operating marginMarsh & McLennan Companies operating marginApollo Global Management revenue growthMarsh & McLennan Companies revenue growthApollo Global Management free cash flowMarsh & McLennan Companies free cash flow
Apollo Global Management & Marsh & McLennan Companies appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 16, 2026.