Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) vs L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX)
APO leads on 9 of 13 compared metrics, though LHX is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Apollo Global Management, Inc. and L3Harris Technologies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
$133.88Financial Services
LHX
L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
$307.79Industrials
Total return — APO vs LHX
growth of $100 · last 15yAPO +657.4%LHX +518.6%APO compounded faster
APO LHX
APO vs LHX: by the numbers
- •APO is the larger company ($79.41B vs $56.84B market cap).
- •LHX trades at the lower earnings multiple (33.42 vs 40.08 P/E).
- •LHX converts more revenue to profit (7.71% vs 7.24% net margin).
- •APO grew revenue faster over the past five years (37.15% vs 4.38% CAGR).
- •LHX pays the higher dividend yield (1.59% vs 1.56%).
Which is better, APO or LHX?
Metric tally: APO 9 · LHX 4It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueLHX(lower P/E)
GrowthAPO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityAPO(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | APO | LHX |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 40.08 | 33.42● |
| Forward P/E | 14.99● | 22.52 |
| P/S ratio | 2.68 | 2.58● |
| P/B ratio | 3.99 | 2.94● |
| PEG ratio | 0.53● | 4.26 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 17.85 |
| FCF yield | — | 4.47% |
Profitability
| Metric | APO | LHX |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 89.33%● | 25.26% |
| Operating margin | 31.05%● | 9.93% |
| Net margin | 7.24% | 7.71%● |
| ROE | 10.78%● | 8.80% |
| ROIC | 7.24%● | 5.14% |
Dividends
| Metric | APO | LHX |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.56% | 1.59% |
| Payout ratio | 28.63% | 57.18% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | APO | LHX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 37.15%● | 4.38% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 75.44%● | 10.38% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | — | 0.45% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 21.35%● | 8.55% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, APO or LHX?
- It depends on your goal. value: LHX (lower P/E); growth: APO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: APO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, APO leads 9 to 4.
- Is APO or LHX cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, LHX is cheaper: APO trades at a 40.08 P/E and LHX at 33.42.
- Which has grown faster, APO or LHX?
- Over the past five years, APO grew revenue faster — APO at a 37.15% CAGR versus LHX at 4.38%.
- Does APO or LHX pay a bigger dividend?
- APO yields 1.56% and LHX yields 1.59% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is APO or LHX more profitable?
- LHX runs the higher net margin — APO at 7.24% versus LHX at 7.71%.
- Which has been the better investment, APO or LHX?
- Over the past 10-year, APO delivered the higher annualized total return — APO at 29.59% versus LHX at 16.33%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Apollo Global Management P/E ratioL3Harris Technologies P/E ratioApollo Global Management dividend yieldL3Harris Technologies dividend yieldApollo Global Management ROEL3Harris Technologies ROEApollo Global Management operating marginL3Harris Technologies operating marginApollo Global Management revenue growthL3Harris Technologies revenue growthApollo Global Management free cash flowL3Harris Technologies free cash flow
Apollo Global Management & L3Harris Technologies appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.