Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) vs Illinois Tool Works Inc. (ITW)
APO leads on 9 of 14 compared metrics, though ITW is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Apollo Global Management, Inc. and Illinois Tool Works Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
$133.88Financial Services
ITW
Illinois Tool Works Inc.
$257.43Industrials
Total return — APO vs ITW
growth of $100 · last 15yAPO +635.6%ITW +380.7%APO compounded faster
APO ITW
APO vs ITW: by the numbers
- •APO is the larger company ($79.41B vs $74.06B market cap).
- •ITW trades at the lower earnings multiple (23.90 vs 40.08 P/E).
- •ITW converts more revenue to profit (19.32% vs 7.24% net margin).
- •APO grew revenue faster over the past five years (37.15% vs 4.71% CAGR).
- •ITW pays the higher dividend yield (2.46% vs 1.56%).
Which is better, APO or ITW?
Metric tally: APO 9 · ITW 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueITW(lower P/E)
GrowthAPO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeITW(higher dividend yield)
QualityITW(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | APO | ITW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 40.08 | 23.90● |
| Forward P/E | 14.99● | 22.78 |
| P/S ratio | 2.68● | 4.59 |
| P/B ratio | 3.99● | 23.05 |
| PEG ratio | 0.53● | 2.50 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 17.79 |
| FCF yield | — | 3.68% |
Profitability
| Metric | APO | ITW |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 89.33%● | 44.12% |
| Operating margin | 31.05%● | 26.42% |
| Net margin | 7.24% | 19.32%● |
| ROE | 10.78% | 97.06%● |
| ROIC | 7.24% | 24.49%● |
Dividends
| Metric | APO | ITW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.56% | 2.46%● |
| Payout ratio | 28.63% | 60.17% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | APO | ITW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 37.15%● | 4.71% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 75.44%● | 9.58% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | — | 1.38% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 21.35%● | 4.45% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, APO or ITW?
- It depends on your goal. value: ITW (lower P/E); growth: APO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: ITW (higher dividend yield); quality: ITW (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, APO leads 9 to 5.
- Is APO or ITW cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, ITW is cheaper: APO trades at a 40.08 P/E and ITW at 23.90.
- Which has grown faster, APO or ITW?
- Over the past five years, APO grew revenue faster — APO at a 37.15% CAGR versus ITW at 4.71%.
- Does APO or ITW pay a bigger dividend?
- APO yields 1.56% and ITW yields 2.46% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is APO or ITW more profitable?
- ITW runs the higher net margin — APO at 7.24% versus ITW at 19.32%.
- Which has been the better investment, APO or ITW?
- Over the past 10-year, APO delivered the higher annualized total return — APO at 29.59% versus ITW at 11.65%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Apollo Global Management P/E ratioIllinois Tool Works P/E ratioApollo Global Management dividend yieldIllinois Tool Works dividend yieldApollo Global Management ROEIllinois Tool Works ROEApollo Global Management operating marginIllinois Tool Works operating marginApollo Global Management revenue growthIllinois Tool Works revenue growthApollo Global Management free cash flowIllinois Tool Works free cash flow
Apollo Global Management & Illinois Tool Works appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.