Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) vs Ecolab Inc. (ECL)
APO leads on 10 of 14 compared metrics, though ECL is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Apollo Global Management, Inc. and Ecolab Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
$133.88Financial Services
ECL
Ecolab Inc.
$265.41Basic Materials
Total return — APO vs ECL
growth of $100 · last 15yAPO +635.6%ECL +427.7%APO compounded faster
APO ECL
APO vs ECL: by the numbers
- •APO is the larger company ($79.41B vs $74.70B market cap).
- •ECL trades at the lower earnings multiple (35.91 vs 40.08 P/E).
- •ECL converts more revenue to profit (12.80% vs 7.24% net margin).
- •APO grew revenue faster over the past five years (37.15% vs 7.14% CAGR).
- •APO pays the higher dividend yield (1.56% vs 1.04%).
Which is better, APO or ECL?
Metric tally: APO 10 · ECL 4It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueECL(lower P/E)
GrowthAPO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeAPO(higher dividend yield)
QualityECL(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | APO | ECL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 40.08 | 35.91● |
| Forward P/E | 14.99● | 31.93 |
| P/S ratio | 2.68● | 4.58 |
| P/B ratio | 3.99● | 7.53 |
| PEG ratio | 0.53● | 6.92 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 25.60 |
| FCF yield | — | 2.48% |
Profitability
| Metric | APO | ECL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 89.33%● | 44.29% |
| Operating margin | 31.05%● | 17.49% |
| Net margin | 7.24% | 12.80%● |
| ROE | 10.78% | 21.05%● |
| ROIC | 7.24% | 11.95%● |
Dividends
| Metric | APO | ECL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.56%● | 1.04% |
| Payout ratio | 28.63% | 37.65% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | APO | ECL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 37.15%● | 7.14% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 75.44%● | 5.19% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | — | 6.68% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 21.35%● | 5.50% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, APO or ECL?
- It depends on your goal. value: ECL (lower P/E); growth: APO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: APO (higher dividend yield); quality: ECL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, APO leads 10 to 4.
- Is APO or ECL cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, ECL is cheaper: APO trades at a 40.08 P/E and ECL at 35.91.
- Which has grown faster, APO or ECL?
- Over the past five years, APO grew revenue faster — APO at a 37.15% CAGR versus ECL at 7.14%.
- Does APO or ECL pay a bigger dividend?
- APO yields 1.56% and ECL yields 1.04% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is APO or ECL more profitable?
- ECL runs the higher net margin — APO at 7.24% versus ECL at 12.80%.
- Which has been the better investment, APO or ECL?
- Over the past 10-year, APO delivered the higher annualized total return — APO at 29.59% versus ECL at 9.42%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Apollo Global Management P/E ratioEcolab P/E ratioApollo Global Management dividend yieldEcolab dividend yieldApollo Global Management ROEEcolab ROEApollo Global Management operating marginEcolab operating marginApollo Global Management revenue growthEcolab revenue growthApollo Global Management free cash flowEcolab free cash flow
Apollo Global Management & Ecolab appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.