Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) vs Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL)
APO leads on 8 of 13 compared metrics, though CL is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Apollo Global Management, Inc. and Colgate-Palmolive Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
$133.88Financial Services
CL
Colgate-Palmolive Company
$89.45Consumer Defensive
Total return — APO vs CL
growth of $100 · last 15yAPO +657.4%CL +122.9%APO compounded faster
APO CL
APO vs CL: by the numbers
- •APO is the larger company ($79.41B vs $72.48B market cap).
- •CL trades at the lower earnings multiple (34.75 vs 40.08 P/E).
- •CL converts more revenue to profit (10.04% vs 7.24% net margin).
- •APO grew revenue faster over the past five years (37.15% vs 4.46% CAGR).
- •CL pays the higher dividend yield (2.34% vs 1.56%).
Which is better, APO or CL?
Metric tally: APO 8 · CL 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCL(lower P/E)
GrowthAPO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeCL(higher dividend yield)
QualityCL(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | APO | CL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 40.08 | 34.75● |
| Forward P/E | 14.99● | 22.18 |
| P/S ratio | 2.68● | 3.46 |
| P/B ratio | 3.99● | 496.66 |
| PEG ratio | 0.53 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 21.17 |
| FCF yield | — | 5.23% |
Profitability
| Metric | APO | CL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 89.33%● | 60.06% |
| Operating margin | 31.05%● | 21.21% |
| Net margin | 7.24% | 10.04%● |
| ROE | 10.78% | 1439.31%● |
| ROIC | 7.24% | 30.34%● |
Dividends
| Metric | APO | CL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.56% | 2.34%● |
| Payout ratio | 28.63% | 79.17% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | APO | CL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 37.15%● | 4.46% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 75.44%● | -3.47% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | — | 3.88% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 21.35%● | 4.12% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, APO or CL?
- It depends on your goal. value: CL (lower P/E); growth: APO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: CL (higher dividend yield); quality: CL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, APO leads 8 to 5.
- Is APO or CL cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CL is cheaper: APO trades at a 40.08 P/E and CL at 34.75.
- Which has grown faster, APO or CL?
- Over the past five years, APO grew revenue faster — APO at a 37.15% CAGR versus CL at 4.46%.
- Does APO or CL pay a bigger dividend?
- APO yields 1.56% and CL yields 2.34% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is APO or CL more profitable?
- CL runs the higher net margin — APO at 7.24% versus CL at 10.04%.
- Which has been the better investment, APO or CL?
- Over the past 10-year, APO delivered the higher annualized total return — APO at 29.59% versus CL at 4.79%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Apollo Global Management P/E ratioColgate-Palmolive P/E ratioApollo Global Management dividend yieldColgate-Palmolive dividend yieldApollo Global Management ROEColgate-Palmolive ROEApollo Global Management operating marginColgate-Palmolive operating marginApollo Global Management revenue growthColgate-Palmolive revenue growthApollo Global Management free cash flowColgate-Palmolive free cash flow
Apollo Global Management & Colgate-Palmolive appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.