Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) vs Cigna Corporation (CI)
CI leads on 7 of 13 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Apollo Global Management, Inc. and Cigna Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
$133.88Financial Services
CI
Cigna Corporation
$298.00Healthcare
Total return — APO vs CI
growth of $100 · last 15yAPO +635.6%CI +584.7%APO compounded faster
APO CI
APO vs CI: by the numbers
- •APO is the larger company ($79.41B vs $78.83B market cap).
- •CI trades at the lower earnings multiple (12.64 vs 40.08 P/E).
- •APO converts more revenue to profit (7.24% vs 2.26% net margin).
- •APO grew revenue faster over the past five years (37.15% vs 11.28% CAGR).
- •CI pays the higher dividend yield (2.06% vs 1.56%).
Which is better, APO or CI?
Metric tally: APO 6 · CI 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCI(lower P/E)
GrowthAPO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeCI(higher dividend yield)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | APO | CI |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 40.08 | 12.64● |
| Forward P/E | 14.99 | 8.91● |
| P/S ratio | 2.68 | 0.28● |
| P/B ratio | 3.99 | 1.87● |
| PEG ratio | 0.53 | 0.15● |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 8.41 |
| FCF yield | — | 9.73% |
Profitability
| Metric | APO | CI |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 89.33%● | 9.30% |
| Operating margin | 31.05%● | 3.42% |
| Net margin | 7.24%● | 2.26% |
| ROE | 10.78% | 14.90%● |
| ROIC | 7.24% | 7.35% |
Dividends
| Metric | APO | CI |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.56% | 2.06%● |
| Payout ratio | 28.63% | 27.53% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | APO | CI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 37.15%● | 11.28% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 75.44%● | -0.76% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | — | -2.03% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 21.35%● | 6.19% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, APO or CI?
- It depends on your goal. value: CI (lower P/E); growth: APO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: CI (higher dividend yield). Across all compared metrics, CI leads 7 to 6.
- Is APO or CI cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CI is cheaper: APO trades at a 40.08 P/E and CI at 12.64.
- Which has grown faster, APO or CI?
- Over the past five years, APO grew revenue faster — APO at a 37.15% CAGR versus CI at 11.28%.
- Does APO or CI pay a bigger dividend?
- APO yields 1.56% and CI yields 2.06% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is APO or CI more profitable?
- APO runs the higher net margin — APO at 7.24% versus CI at 2.26%.
- Which has been the better investment, APO or CI?
- Over the past 10-year, APO delivered the higher annualized total return — APO at 29.59% versus CI at 9.91%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Apollo Global Management P/E ratioCigna P/E ratioApollo Global Management dividend yieldCigna dividend yieldApollo Global Management ROECigna ROEApollo Global Management operating marginCigna operating marginApollo Global Management revenue growthCigna revenue growthApollo Global Management free cash flowCigna free cash flow
Apollo Global Management & Cigna appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.