Amphenol Corporation (APH) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM)
QCOM leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Amphenol Corporation and QUALCOMM Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — APH vs QCOM
growth of $100 · last 30yAPH +39871.9%QCOM +7028.6%APH compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
APH QCOM
APH vs QCOM: by the numbers
- •QCOM is the larger company ($223.15B vs $189.21B market cap).
- •QCOM trades at the lower earnings multiple (22.72 vs 44.20 P/E).
- •QCOM converts more revenue to profit (22.31% vs 17.28% net margin).
- •APH grew revenue faster over the past five years (23.24% vs 8.63% CAGR).
- •QCOM pays the higher dividend yield (1.70% vs 0.54%).
Which is better, APH or QCOM?
Metric tally: APH 6 · QCOM 10It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueQCOM(lower P/E)
GrowthAPH(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeQCOM(higher dividend yield)
QualityAPH(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | APH | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 44.20 | 22.72● |
| Forward P/E | 32.36 | 19.72● |
| P/S ratio | 7.66 | 5.10● |
| P/B ratio | 14.19 | 8.32● |
| PEG ratio | 0.52● | 3.96 |
| EV / EBITDA | 26.77 | 16.71● |
| FCF yield | 2.33% | 5.51%● |
Profitability
| Metric | APH | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 37.35% | 54.80%● |
| Operating margin | 26.00% | 25.52% |
| Net margin | 17.28% | 22.31%● |
| ROE | 32.02% | 36.38%● |
| ROIC | 15.12%● | 13.15% |
Dividends
| Metric | APH | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.54% | 1.70%● |
| Payout ratio | 23.65% | 70.95% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | APH | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 23.24%● | 8.63% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 28.30%● | 5.74% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 30.28%● | 9.39% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 36.28%● | 11.87% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, APH or QCOM?
- It depends on your goal. value: QCOM (lower P/E); growth: APH (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: QCOM (higher dividend yield); quality: APH (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, QCOM leads 10 to 6.
- Is APH or QCOM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, QCOM is cheaper: APH trades at a 44.20 P/E and QCOM at 22.72.
- Which has grown faster, APH or QCOM?
- Over the past five years, APH grew revenue faster — APH at a 23.24% CAGR versus QCOM at 8.63%.
- Does APH or QCOM pay a bigger dividend?
- APH yields 0.54% and QCOM yields 1.70% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is APH or QCOM more profitable?
- QCOM runs the higher net margin — APH at 17.28% versus QCOM at 22.31%.
- Which has been the better investment, APH or QCOM?
- Over the past 10-year, APH delivered the higher annualized total return — APH at 27.47% versus QCOM at 17.83%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Amphenol P/E ratioQUALCOMM P/E ratioAmphenol dividend yieldQUALCOMM dividend yieldAmphenol ROEQUALCOMM ROEAmphenol operating marginQUALCOMM operating marginAmphenol revenue growthQUALCOMM revenue growthAmphenol free cash flowQUALCOMM free cash flow
Amphenol & QUALCOMM appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.