Is APH or GLW cheaper?

On trailing earnings, APH is cheaper: APH trades at a 47.46 P/E and GLW at 108.58.

Which has grown faster, APH or GLW?

Over the past five years, APH grew revenue faster — APH at a 23.24% CAGR versus GLW at 5.99%.

Does APH or GLW pay a bigger dividend?

APH yields 0.55% and GLW yields 0.49% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is APH or GLW more profitable?

APH runs the higher net margin — APH at 17.28% versus GLW at 11.09%.

Which has been the better investment, APH or GLW?

Over the past 10-year, GLW delivered the higher annualized total return — APH at 28.90% versus GLW at 31.06%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Amphenol Corporation (APH) vs Corning Inc (GLW)

APH leads on 14 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Amphenol Corporation and Corning Inc across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 26, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — APH vs GLW

growth of $100 · last 30y

APH +50230.7%GLW +1688.3%APH compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

APH GLW

APH vs GLW: by the numbers

•APH is the larger company ($203.17B vs $196.34B market cap).
•APH trades at the lower earnings multiple (47.46 vs 108.58 P/E).
•APH converts more revenue to profit (17.28% vs 11.09% net margin).
•APH grew revenue faster over the past five years (23.24% vs 5.99% CAGR).
•APH pays the higher dividend yield (0.55% vs 0.49%).

Which is better, APH or GLW?

Metric tally: APH 14 · GLW 2

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueAPH(lower P/E)

GrowthAPH(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeAPH(higher dividend yield)

QualityAPH(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	APH	GLW
P/E ratio	47.46●	108.58
Forward P/E	34.54●	71.52
P/S ratio	8.22●	12.05
P/B ratio	15.24●	16.65
PEG ratio	0.52	0.22●
EV / EBITDA	28.61●	54.05
FCF yield	2.17%●	0.76%

Profitability

Metric	APH	GLW
Gross margin	37.35%●	36.31%
Operating margin	26.00%●	15.31%
Net margin	17.28%●	11.09%
ROE	32.02%●	15.32%
ROIC	15.12%●	7.54%

Dividends

Metric	APH	GLW
Dividend yield	0.55%●	0.49%
Payout ratio	26.07%	60.22%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	APH	GLW
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	23.24%●	5.99%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	28.30%	28.07%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	30.28%●	-0.45%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	38.45%	44.69%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, APH or GLW?: It depends on your goal. value: APH (lower P/E); growth: APH (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: APH (higher dividend yield); quality: APH (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, APH leads 14 to 2.
Is APH or GLW cheaper?: On trailing earnings, APH is cheaper: APH trades at a 47.46 P/E and GLW at 108.58.
Which has grown faster, APH or GLW?: Over the past five years, APH grew revenue faster — APH at a 23.24% CAGR versus GLW at 5.99%.
Does APH or GLW pay a bigger dividend?: APH yields 0.55% and GLW yields 0.49% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is APH or GLW more profitable?: APH runs the higher net margin — APH at 17.28% versus GLW at 11.09%.
Which has been the better investment, APH or GLW?: Over the past 10-year, GLW delivered the higher annualized total return — APH at 28.90% versus GLW at 31.06%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full APH analysis Full GLW analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Amphenol P/E ratio Corning P/E ratio Amphenol dividend yield Corning dividend yield Amphenol ROE Corning ROE Amphenol operating margin Corning operating margin Amphenol revenue growth Corning revenue growth Amphenol free cash flow Corning free cash flow

Amphenol & Corning appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks Largest Companies by Market Cap

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 26, 2026.