Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (APD) vs Nutrien Ltd. (NTR)
NTR leads on 11 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. and Nutrien Ltd. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 17, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
APD
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.
$280.48Basic Materials
NTR
Nutrien Ltd.
$64.28Basic Materials
Total return — APD vs NTR
growth of $100 · last 8yAPD +71.7%NTR +17.4%APD compounded faster
APD NTR
APD vs NTR: by the numbers
- •APD is the larger company ($62.80B vs $30.93B market cap).
- •NTR trades at the lower earnings multiple (13.09 vs 29.67 P/E).
- •APD converts more revenue to profit (16.91% vs 8.58% net margin).
- •APD grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.12% vs 5.38% CAGR).
- •NTR pays the higher dividend yield (3.40% vs 2.56%).
Which is better, APD or NTR?
Metric tally: APD 6 · NTR 11It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueNTR(lower P/E)
GrowthAPD(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeNTR(higher dividend yield)
QualityNTR(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | APD | NTR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 29.67 | 13.09● |
| Forward P/E | 19.63 | 12.17● |
| P/S ratio | 5.02 | 1.11● |
| P/B ratio | 3.99 | 1.23● |
| PEG ratio | 1.40 | 0.05● |
| EV / EBITDA | 17.61 | 6.99● |
| FCF yield | 1.77% | 7.20%● |
Profitability
| Metric | APD | NTR |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 31.98%● | 31.16% |
| Operating margin | 18.41%● | 14.15% |
| Net margin | 16.91%● | 8.58% |
| ROE | 13.47%● | 9.46% |
| ROIC | -1.82% | 6.79%● |
Dividends
| Metric | APD | NTR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.56% | 3.40%● |
| Payout ratio | — | 46.10% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | APD | NTR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 6.12%● | 5.38% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 16.58% | 41.02%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 6.54%● | 0.42% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 1.31% | 5.10%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, APD or NTR?
- It depends on your goal. value: NTR (lower P/E); growth: APD (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: NTR (higher dividend yield); quality: NTR (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NTR leads 11 to 6.
- Is APD or NTR cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, NTR is cheaper: APD trades at a 29.67 P/E and NTR at 13.09.
- Which has grown faster, APD or NTR?
- Over the past five years, APD grew revenue faster — APD at a 6.12% CAGR versus NTR at 5.38%.
- Does APD or NTR pay a bigger dividend?
- APD yields 2.56% and NTR yields 3.40% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is APD or NTR more profitable?
- APD runs the higher net margin — APD at 16.91% versus NTR at 8.58%.
- Which has been the better investment, APD or NTR?
- Over the past 5-year, APD delivered the higher annualized total return — APD at 10.51% versus NTR at 5.10%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Air Products and Chemicals P/E ratioNutrien P/E ratioAir Products and Chemicals dividend yieldNutrien dividend yieldAir Products and Chemicals ROENutrien ROEAir Products and Chemicals operating marginNutrien operating marginAir Products and Chemicals revenue growthNutrien revenue growthAir Products and Chemicals free cash flowNutrien free cash flow
Air Products and Chemicals & Nutrien appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 17, 2026.