Which has grown faster, AP or TRN?

Over the past five years, AP grew revenue faster — AP at a 6.21% CAGR versus TRN at 3.77%.

Does AP or TRN pay a bigger dividend?

TRN pays a dividend (3.51% yield) while AP does not currently pay one.

Is AP or TRN more profitable?

TRN runs the higher net margin — AP at -15.53% versus TRN at 12.37%.

Which has been the better investment, AP or TRN?

Over the past 10-year, TRN delivered the higher annualized total return — AP at -1.25% versus TRN at 13.80%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (AP) vs Trinity Industries, Inc. (TRN)

TRN leads on 8 of 11 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation and Trinity Industries, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation

$240M

$11.83Industrials

TRN

Trinity Industries, Inc.

$2.76B

$34.76Industrials

Total return — AP vs TRN

growth of $100 · last 30y

AP -6.3%TRN +313.8%TRN compounded faster

AP TRN

AP vs TRN: by the numbers

•TRN is the larger company ($2.76B vs $240M market cap).
•TRN is profitable (12.37% net margin) while AP runs a net loss (-15.53%).
•AP grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.21% vs 3.77% CAGR).
•TRN pays a dividend (3.51% yield) while AP does not currently pay one.

Which is better, AP or TRN?

Metric tally: AP 3 · TRN 8

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthAP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityTRN(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	AP	TRN
P/E ratio	—	11.14
Forward P/E	—	14.95
P/S ratio	0.55●	1.38
P/B ratio	7.64	2.64●
PEG ratio	—	0.10
EV / EBITDA	—	8.46

Profitability

Metric	AP	TRN
Gross margin	14.54%	27.01%●
Operating margin	0.17%	16.59%●
Net margin	-15.53%	12.37%●
ROE	-217.33%	23.66%●
ROIC	1.59%	3.46%●

Dividends

Metric	AP	TRN
Dividend yield	—	3.51%
Payout ratio	—	38.98%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AP	TRN
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.21%●	3.77%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-17.91%	19.40%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-46.19%	-8.79%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	12.00%●	7.19%

Frequently asked

Which is better, AP or TRN?: It depends on your goal. growth: AP (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: TRN (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TRN leads 8 to 3.
Which has grown faster, AP or TRN?: Over the past five years, AP grew revenue faster — AP at a 6.21% CAGR versus TRN at 3.77%.
Does AP or TRN pay a bigger dividend?: TRN pays a dividend (3.51% yield) while AP does not currently pay one.
Is AP or TRN more profitable?: TRN runs the higher net margin — AP at -15.53% versus TRN at 12.37%.
Which has been the better investment, AP or TRN?: Over the past 10-year, TRN delivered the higher annualized total return — AP at -1.25% versus TRN at 13.80%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AP analysis Full TRN analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Ampco-Pittsburgh P/E ratio Trinity Industries P/E ratio Ampco-Pittsburgh dividend yield Trinity Industries dividend yield Ampco-Pittsburgh ROE Trinity Industries ROE Ampco-Pittsburgh operating margin Trinity Industries operating margin Ampco-Pittsburgh revenue growth Trinity Industries revenue growth Ampco-Pittsburgh free cash flow Trinity Industries free cash flow

Ampco-Pittsburgh & Trinity Industries appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.