Which has grown faster, AP or EPAC?

Over the past five years, EPAC grew revenue faster — AP at a 6.21% CAGR versus EPAC at 6.64%.

Does AP or EPAC pay a bigger dividend?

EPAC pays a dividend (0.11% yield) while AP does not currently pay one.

Is AP or EPAC more profitable?

EPAC runs the higher net margin — AP at -15.53% versus EPAC at 13.69%.

Which has been the better investment, AP or EPAC?

Over the past 10-year, EPAC delivered the higher annualized total return — AP at -1.25% versus EPAC at 3.09%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (AP) vs Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC)

EPAC leads on 9 of 11 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation and Enerpac Tool Group Corp. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation

$240M

$11.83Industrials

EPAC

Enerpac Tool Group Corp.

$1.85B

$35.05Industrials

Total return — AP vs EPAC

growth of $100 · last 30y

AP -7.2%EPAC +2477.2%EPAC compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

AP EPAC

AP vs EPAC: by the numbers

•EPAC is the larger company ($1.85B vs $240M market cap).
•EPAC is profitable (13.69% net margin) while AP runs a net loss (-15.53%).
•EPAC grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.64% vs 6.21% CAGR).
•EPAC pays a dividend (0.11% yield) while AP does not currently pay one.

Which is better, AP or EPAC?

Metric tally: AP 2 · EPAC 9

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthEPAC(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityEPAC(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	AP	EPAC
P/E ratio	—	21.91
Forward P/E	—	18.50
P/S ratio	0.55●	2.96
P/B ratio	7.64	4.54●
PEG ratio	—	2.78
EV / EBITDA	—	13.91
FCF yield	—	5.98%

Profitability

Metric	AP	EPAC
Gross margin	14.54%	48.58%●
Operating margin	0.17%	20.52%●
Net margin	-15.53%	13.69%●
ROE	-217.33%	21.00%●
ROIC	1.59%	15.12%●

Dividends

Metric	AP	EPAC
Dividend yield	—	0.11%
Payout ratio	—	2.33%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AP	EPAC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.21%	6.64%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-17.91%	169.53%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-46.19%	31.53%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	12.00%●	6.02%

Frequently asked

Which is better, AP or EPAC?: It depends on your goal. growth: EPAC (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: EPAC (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, EPAC leads 9 to 2.
Which has grown faster, AP or EPAC?: Over the past five years, EPAC grew revenue faster — AP at a 6.21% CAGR versus EPAC at 6.64%.
Does AP or EPAC pay a bigger dividend?: EPAC pays a dividend (0.11% yield) while AP does not currently pay one.
Is AP or EPAC more profitable?: EPAC runs the higher net margin — AP at -15.53% versus EPAC at 13.69%.
Which has been the better investment, AP or EPAC?: Over the past 10-year, EPAC delivered the higher annualized total return — AP at -1.25% versus EPAC at 3.09%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AP analysis Full EPAC analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Ampco-Pittsburgh P/E ratio Enerpac Tool P/E ratio Ampco-Pittsburgh dividend yield Enerpac Tool dividend yield Ampco-Pittsburgh ROE Enerpac Tool ROE Ampco-Pittsburgh operating margin Enerpac Tool operating margin Ampco-Pittsburgh revenue growth Enerpac Tool revenue growth Ampco-Pittsburgh free cash flow Enerpac Tool free cash flow

Ampco-Pittsburgh & Enerpac Tool appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.