Ampco-Pittsburgh Corp. (AP) vs BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT)
BGT leads on 9 of 10 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corp. and BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
AP
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corp.
$8.20IndustrialsAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
BGT
BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust
$10.79Financial ServicesAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — AP vs BGT
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 22yAP -6.8%BGT +190.8%BGT compounded faster
AP BGT
AP vs BGT: by the numbers
- •BGT is the larger company ($322M vs $167M market cap).
- •BGT is profitable (71.60% net margin) while AP runs a net loss (-15.53%).
- •BGT grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.30% vs 6.21% CAGR).
- •BGT pays a dividend (13.38% yield) while AP does not currently pay one.
Which is better, AP or BGT?
Metric tally: AP 1 · BGT 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
GrowthBGT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityBGT(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AP | BGT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | — | 9.90 |
| P/S ratio | 0.38● | 7.54 |
| P/B ratio | 5.30 | 0.82● |
| PEG ratio | — | 0.23 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.49 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | AP | BGT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 14.54% | 84.12%● |
| Operating margin | 0.17% | 87.84%● |
| Net margin | -15.53% | 71.60%● |
| ROE | -217.33% | 7.75%● |
| ROIC | 1.59% | 4.57%● |
Dividends
| Metric | AP | BGT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 13.38% |
| Payout ratio | — | 197.72% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AP | BGT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 6.21% | 9.30%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -17.91% | 43.50%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -46.19% | — |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 6.23% | 6.98%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AP or BGT?
- It depends on your goal. growth: BGT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: BGT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, BGT leads 9 to 1.
- Which has grown faster, AP or BGT?
- Over the past five years, BGT grew revenue faster — AP at a 6.21% CAGR versus BGT at 9.30%.
- Does AP or BGT pay a bigger dividend?
- BGT pays a dividend (13.38% yield) while AP does not currently pay one.
- Is AP or BGT more profitable?
- BGT runs the higher net margin — AP at -15.53% versus BGT at 71.60%.
- Which has been the better investment, AP or BGT?
- Over the past 10-year, BGT delivered the higher annualized total return — AP at -3.73% versus BGT at 6.46%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Ampco-Pittsburgh P/E ratioBlackRock Floating Rate Income P/E ratioAmpco-Pittsburgh dividend yieldBlackRock Floating Rate Income dividend yieldAmpco-Pittsburgh ROEBlackRock Floating Rate Income ROEAmpco-Pittsburgh operating marginBlackRock Floating Rate Income operating marginAmpco-Pittsburgh revenue growthBlackRock Floating Rate Income revenue growthAmpco-Pittsburgh free cash flowBlackRock Floating Rate Income free cash flow
Ampco-Pittsburgh & BlackRock Floating Rate Income appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 25, 2026.