A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS) vs Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO)

AOS leads on 10 of 17 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of A. O. Smith Corporation and Silicon Motion Technology Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Compare

Total returnAOS vs SIMO

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 21y
AOS +1894.6%SIMO +3536.4%SIMO compounded faster
01k2k3k4kStart $10020092013201720212025$1,995$3,636
AOS SIMO

AOS vs SIMO: by the numbers

  • SIMO is the larger company ($9.09B vs $8.49B market cap).
  • AOS trades at the lower earnings multiple (16.16 vs 21.10 P/E).
  • SIMO converts more revenue to profit (16.02% vs 13.84% net margin).
  • SIMO grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.49% vs 4.72% CAGR).
  • AOS pays the higher dividend yield (2.34% vs 0.74%).

Which is better, AOS or SIMO?

Metric tally: AOS 10 · SIMO 7

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueAOS(lower P/E)
GrowthSIMO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeAOS(higher dividend yield)
QualityAOS(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricAOSSIMO
P/E ratio16.1621.10
Forward P/E16.1530.51
P/S ratio2.222.57
P/B ratio4.502.74
PEG ratio3.010.17
EV / EBITDA11.2316.83
FCF yield7.66%0.28%

Profitability

MetricAOSSIMO
Gross margin38.77%48.09%
Operating margin18.55%12.77%
Net margin13.84%16.02%
ROE28.10%18.76%
ROIC23.94%9.22%

Dividends

MetricAOSSIMO
Dividend yield2.34%0.74%
Payout ratio36.79%13.70%

Growth (annualized)

MetricAOSSIMO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)4.72%12.49%
EPS CAGR (5Y)12.52%44.85%
FCF CAGR (5Y)3.27%-42.15%
Total return CAGR (5Y)-0.89%37.15%

Frequently asked

Which is better, AOS or SIMO?
It depends on your goal. value: AOS (lower P/E); growth: SIMO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: AOS (higher dividend yield); quality: AOS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, AOS leads 10 to 7.
Is AOS or SIMO cheaper?
On trailing earnings, AOS is cheaper: AOS trades at a 16.16 P/E and SIMO at 21.10.
Which has grown faster, AOS or SIMO?
Over the past five years, SIMO grew revenue faster — AOS at a 4.72% CAGR versus SIMO at 12.49%.
Does AOS or SIMO pay a bigger dividend?
AOS yields 2.34% and SIMO yields 0.74% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is AOS or SIMO more profitable?
SIMO runs the higher net margin — AOS at 13.84% versus SIMO at 16.02%.
Which has been the better investment, AOS or SIMO?
Over the past 10-year, SIMO delivered the higher annualized total return — AOS at 4.84% versus SIMO at 20.85%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 25, 2026.