Is AOS or ENS cheaper?

On trailing earnings, AOS is cheaper: AOS trades at a 16.01 P/E and ENS at 28.40.

Which has grown faster, AOS or ENS?

Over the past five years, ENS grew revenue faster — AOS at a 4.72% CAGR versus ENS at 4.73%.

Does AOS or ENS pay a bigger dividend?

AOS yields 2.36% and ENS yields 0.48% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is AOS or ENS more profitable?

AOS runs the higher net margin — AOS at 13.84% versus ENS at 7.82%.

Which has been the better investment, AOS or ENS?

Over the past 10-year, ENS delivered the higher annualized total return — AOS at 5.44% versus ENS at 15.50%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS) vs EnerSys (ENS)

AOS leads on 10 of 14 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of A. O. Smith Corporation and EnerSys across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

AOS

A. O. Smith Corporation

Total return — AOS vs ENS

growth of $100 · last 22y

AOS +1151.1%ENS +1687.4%ENS compounded faster

AOS ENS

AOS vs ENS: by the numbers

•AOS is the larger company ($8.41B vs $8.29B market cap).
•AOS trades at the lower earnings multiple (16.01 vs 28.40 P/E).
•AOS converts more revenue to profit (13.84% vs 7.82% net margin).
•AOS pays the higher dividend yield (2.36% vs 0.48%).

Which is better, AOS or ENS?

Metric tally: AOS 10 · ENS 4

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueAOS(lower P/E)

IncomeAOS(higher dividend yield)

QualityAOS(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	AOS	ENS
P/E ratio	16.01●	28.40
Forward P/E	15.92●	21.17
P/S ratio	2.20	2.23
P/B ratio	4.46	4.38
PEG ratio	3.01	0.26●
EV / EBITDA	11.13●	17.80
FCF yield	7.73%●	5.60%

Profitability

Metric	AOS	ENS
Gross margin	38.77%●	29.26%
Operating margin	18.55%●	11.87%
Net margin	13.84%●	7.82%
ROE	28.10%●	15.40%
ROIC	23.94%●	12.37%

Dividends

Metric	AOS	ENS
Dividend yield	2.36%●	0.48%
Payout ratio	36.79%	13.39%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AOS	ENS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	4.72%	4.73%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	12.52%	18.40%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	3.27%	10.15%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-0.55%	19.48%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, AOS or ENS?: It depends on your goal. value: AOS (lower P/E); income: AOS (higher dividend yield); quality: AOS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, AOS leads 10 to 4.
Is AOS or ENS cheaper?: On trailing earnings, AOS is cheaper: AOS trades at a 16.01 P/E and ENS at 28.40.
Which has grown faster, AOS or ENS?: Over the past five years, ENS grew revenue faster — AOS at a 4.72% CAGR versus ENS at 4.73%.
Does AOS or ENS pay a bigger dividend?: AOS yields 2.36% and ENS yields 0.48% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is AOS or ENS more profitable?: AOS runs the higher net margin — AOS at 13.84% versus ENS at 7.82%.
Which has been the better investment, AOS or ENS?: Over the past 10-year, ENS delivered the higher annualized total return — AOS at 5.44% versus ENS at 15.50%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AOS analysis Full ENS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

A. O. Smith P/E ratio EnerSys P/E ratio A. O. Smith dividend yield EnerSys dividend yield A. O. Smith ROE EnerSys ROE A. O. Smith operating margin EnerSys operating margin A. O. Smith revenue growth EnerSys revenue growth A. O. Smith free cash flow EnerSys free cash flow

A. O. Smith & EnerSys appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Dividend Aristocrats Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 25, 2026.