Which has the lower trailing P/E, AOS or ENS?

AOS has the lower trailing P/E: AOS trades at 15.81 and ENS at 21.02. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, AOS or ENS?

Over the past five years, ENS grew revenue faster — AOS at a 3.37% CAGR versus ENS at 4.20%.

Does AOS or ENS pay a bigger dividend?

AOS yields 2.54% and ENS yields 0.55% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is AOS or ENS more profitable?

AOS runs the higher net margin — AOS at 13.15% versus ENS at 9.29%.

How have AOS and ENS total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, AOS delivered 3.14% and ENS delivered 12.02% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS) vs EnerSys (ENS)

A side-by-side comparison of A. O. Smith Corporation and EnerSys across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 4, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

AOS

A. O. Smith Corporation

$7.86B

$56.75IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

ENS

EnerSys

$7.16B

$196.30IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — AOS vs ENS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

AOS +37.5% (+3.2%/yr)ENS +213.4% (+12.1%/yr)ENS compounded faster over this window

AOS ENS

AOS vs ENS: by the numbers

•AOS is the larger company ($7.86B vs $7.16B market cap).
•AOS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (15.81 vs 21.02 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•AOS converts more revenue to profit (13.15% vs 9.29% net margin).
•ENS grew revenue faster over the past five years (4.20% vs 3.37% CAGR).
•AOS pays the higher dividend yield (2.54% vs 0.55%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	AOS	ENS
P/E ratio	15.81	21.02
Forward P/E	15.21	14.68
PEG ratio	1.24	1.15
P/S ratio	2.07	1.89
P/B ratio	4.27	3.63
EV / EBITDA	10.98	12.21
FCF yield	8.13%	10.02%

Profitability

Metric	AOS	ENS
Gross margin	38.59%	30.51%
Operating margin	17.57%	13.45%
Net margin	13.15%	9.29%
ROE	27.16%	17.89%
ROIC	18.44%	13.39%

Dividends

Metric	AOS	ENS
Dividend yield	2.54%	0.55%
Payout ratio	40.11%	11.51%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AOS	ENS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	3.37%	4.20%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	12.52%	18.40%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	4.38%	39.95%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	0.27%	21.83%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, AOS or ENS?: AOS has the lower trailing P/E: AOS trades at 15.81 and ENS at 21.02. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, AOS or ENS?: Over the past five years, ENS grew revenue faster — AOS at a 3.37% CAGR versus ENS at 4.20%.
Does AOS or ENS pay a bigger dividend?: AOS yields 2.54% and ENS yields 0.55% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is AOS or ENS more profitable?: AOS runs the higher net margin — AOS at 13.15% versus ENS at 9.29%.
How have AOS and ENS total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, AOS delivered 3.14% and ENS delivered 12.02% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AOS analysis Full ENS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

A. O. Smith P/E ratio EnerSys P/E ratio A. O. Smith dividend yield EnerSys dividend yield A. O. Smith ROE EnerSys ROE A. O. Smith operating margin EnerSys operating margin A. O. Smith revenue growth EnerSys revenue growth A. O. Smith free cash flow EnerSys free cash flow

A. O. Smith & EnerSys appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks 25+ Year Dividend Growers Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 4, 2026.