Which has grown faster, ANF or MSC?

Over the past five years, MSC grew revenue faster — ANF at a 11.00% CAGR versus MSC at 69.81%.

Is ANF or MSC more profitable?

ANF runs the higher net margin — ANF at 9.34% versus MSC at -5.63%.

Which has been the better investment, ANF or MSC?

Over the past 5-year, ANF delivered the higher annualized total return — ANF at 19.32% versus MSC at -30.17%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) vs Studio City International Holdings Limited (MSC)

ANF leads on 7 of 11 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Abercrombie & Fitch Co. and Studio City International Holdings Limited across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 11, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

ANF

Abercrombie & Fitch Co.

$4.14B

$93.07Consumer Cyclical

MSC

Studio City International Holdings Limited

$87M

$1.76Consumer Cyclical

Total return — ANF vs MSC

growth of $100 · last 8y

ANF +415.6%MSC -88.6%ANF compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

ANF MSC

ANF vs MSC: by the numbers

•ANF is the larger company ($4.14B vs $87M market cap).
•ANF is profitable (9.34% net margin) while MSC runs a net loss (-5.63%).
•MSC grew revenue faster over the past five years (69.81% vs 11.00% CAGR).

Which is better, ANF or MSC?

Metric tally: ANF 7 · MSC 4

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthMSC(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityANF(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ANF	MSC
P/E ratio	8.93	—
Forward P/E	9.46	—
P/S ratio	0.80	0.12●
P/B ratio	3.17	0.17●
PEG ratio	0.15	—
EV / EBITDA	5.88●	6.89
FCF yield	9.78%	—

Profitability

Metric	ANF	MSC
Gross margin	60.86%	68.05%●
Operating margin	12.94%●	11.60%
Net margin	9.34%●	-5.63%
ROE	36.84%●	-7.94%
ROIC	18.66%●	2.68%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ANF	MSC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	11.00%	69.81%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	61.20%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	7.11%●	-20.72%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	15.82%●	-30.17%

Frequently asked

Which is better, ANF or MSC?: It depends on your goal. growth: MSC (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: ANF (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ANF leads 7 to 4.
Which has grown faster, ANF or MSC?: Over the past five years, MSC grew revenue faster — ANF at a 11.00% CAGR versus MSC at 69.81%.
Is ANF or MSC more profitable?: ANF runs the higher net margin — ANF at 9.34% versus MSC at -5.63%.
Which has been the better investment, ANF or MSC?: Over the past 5-year, ANF delivered the higher annualized total return — ANF at 19.32% versus MSC at -30.17%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ANF analysis Full MSC analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Abercrombie & Fitch P/E ratio Studio City International P/E ratio Abercrombie & Fitch dividend yield Studio City International dividend yield Abercrombie & Fitch ROE Studio City International ROE Abercrombie & Fitch operating margin Studio City International operating margin Abercrombie & Fitch revenue growth Studio City International revenue growth Abercrombie & Fitch free cash flow Studio City International free cash flow

Abercrombie & Fitch & Studio City International appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 11, 2026.