Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) vs The Buckle, Inc. (BKE)
ANF leads on 11 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Abercrombie & Fitch Co. and The Buckle, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 28, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
ANF
Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
$91.51Consumer Cyclical
BKE
The Buckle, Inc.
$43.24Consumer Cyclical
Total return — ANF vs BKE
growth of $100 · last 30yANF +691.4%BKE +825.9%BKE compounded faster
ANF BKE
ANF vs BKE: by the numbers
- •ANF is the larger company ($4.07B vs $2.23B market cap).
- •ANF trades at the lower earnings multiple (8.78 vs 9.92 P/E).
- •BKE converts more revenue to profit (16.85% vs 9.34% net margin).
- •ANF grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.07% vs 3.91% CAGR).
- •BKE pays a dividend (3.24% yield) while ANF does not currently pay one.
Which is better, ANF or BKE?
Metric tally: ANF 11 · BKE 4It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueANF(lower P/E)
GrowthANF(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityBKE(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ANF | BKE |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 8.78● | 9.92 |
| Forward P/E | 9.30● | 10.63 |
| P/S ratio | 0.79● | 1.68 |
| P/B ratio | 3.12● | 4.81 |
| PEG ratio | 0.14● | 1.78 |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.79● | 7.59 |
| FCF yield | 9.95% | 10.02% |
Profitability
| Metric | ANF | BKE |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 60.86%● | 48.87% |
| Operating margin | 12.94% | 21.10%● |
| Net margin | 9.34% | 16.85%● |
| ROE | 36.84% | 48.26%● |
| ROIC | 18.66% | 23.63%● |
Dividends
| Metric | ANF | BKE |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 3.24% |
| Payout ratio | — | 33.57% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ANF | BKE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.07%● | 3.91% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 61.20%● | 9.32% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 7.11%● | -8.21% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 14.62%● | 0.47% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ANF or BKE?
- It depends on your goal. value: ANF (lower P/E); growth: ANF (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: BKE (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ANF leads 11 to 4.
- Is ANF or BKE cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, ANF is cheaper: ANF trades at a 8.78 P/E and BKE at 9.92.
- Which has grown faster, ANF or BKE?
- Over the past five years, ANF grew revenue faster — ANF at a 9.07% CAGR versus BKE at 3.91%.
- Does ANF or BKE pay a bigger dividend?
- BKE pays a dividend (3.24% yield) while ANF does not currently pay one.
- Is ANF or BKE more profitable?
- BKE runs the higher net margin — ANF at 9.34% versus BKE at 16.85%.
- Which has been the better investment, ANF or BKE?
- Over the past 10-year, ANF delivered the higher annualized total return — ANF at 19.98% versus BKE at 9.37%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Abercrombie & Fitch P/E ratioBuckle P/E ratioAbercrombie & Fitch dividend yieldBuckle dividend yieldAbercrombie & Fitch ROEBuckle ROEAbercrombie & Fitch operating marginBuckle operating marginAbercrombie & Fitch revenue growthBuckle revenue growthAbercrombie & Fitch free cash flowBuckle free cash flow
Abercrombie & Fitch & Buckle appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 28, 2026.