AMETEK, Inc. (AME) vs Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC)
NSC leads on 13 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of AMETEK, Inc. and Norfolk Southern Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — AME vs NSC
growth of $100 · last 30yAME +7305.8%NSC +1006.6%AME compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
AME NSC
AME vs NSC: by the numbers
- •NSC is the larger company ($69.69B vs $53.18B market cap).
- •NSC trades at the lower earnings multiple (26.14 vs 34.31 P/E).
- •NSC converts more revenue to profit (21.91% vs 20.11% net margin).
- •AME grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.78% vs 4.45% CAGR).
- •NSC pays the higher dividend yield (1.74% vs 0.57%).
Which is better, AME or NSC?
Metric tally: AME 4 · NSC 13It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueNSC(lower P/E)
GrowthAME(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeNSC(higher dividend yield)
QualityAME(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AME | NSC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 34.31 | 26.14● |
| Forward P/E | 25.78 | 22.93● |
| P/S ratio | 6.87 | 5.73● |
| P/B ratio | 4.78 | 4.42● |
| PEG ratio | 4.05 | 2.24● |
| EV / EBITDA | 23.88 | 15.51● |
| FCF yield | 3.26% | 5.47%● |
Profitability
| Metric | AME | NSC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 36.56% | 45.31%● |
| Operating margin | 26.17% | 32.39%● |
| Net margin | 20.11% | 21.91%● |
| ROE | 13.99% | 16.89%● |
| ROIC | 10.99%● | 7.47% |
Dividends
| Metric | AME | NSC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.57% | 1.74%● |
| Payout ratio | 20.25% | 42.35% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AME | NSC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 10.78%● | 4.45% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 11.06%● | 10.10% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 6.90% | 10.65%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 11.79%● | 4.74% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AME or NSC?
- It depends on your goal. value: NSC (lower P/E); growth: AME (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: NSC (higher dividend yield); quality: AME (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NSC leads 13 to 4.
- Is AME or NSC cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, NSC is cheaper: AME trades at a 34.31 P/E and NSC at 26.14.
- Which has grown faster, AME or NSC?
- Over the past five years, AME grew revenue faster — AME at a 10.78% CAGR versus NSC at 4.45%.
- Does AME or NSC pay a bigger dividend?
- AME yields 0.57% and NSC yields 1.74% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is AME or NSC more profitable?
- NSC runs the higher net margin — AME at 20.11% versus NSC at 21.91%.
- Which has been the better investment, AME or NSC?
- Over the past 10-year, AME delivered the higher annualized total return — AME at 18.19% versus NSC at 16.37%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
AMETEK P/E ratioNorfolk Southern P/E ratioAMETEK dividend yieldNorfolk Southern dividend yieldAMETEK ROENorfolk Southern ROEAMETEK operating marginNorfolk Southern operating marginAMETEK revenue growthNorfolk Southern revenue growthAMETEK free cash flowNorfolk Southern free cash flow
AMETEK & Norfolk Southern appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.