Which has grown faster, AME or BE?

Over the past five years, BE grew revenue faster — AME at a 10.78% CAGR versus BE at 24.12%.

Does AME or BE pay a bigger dividend?

AME pays a dividend (0.56% yield) while BE does not currently pay one.

Is AME or BE more profitable?

AME runs the higher net margin — AME at 20.11% versus BE at 0.25%.

Which has been the better investment, AME or BE?

Over the past 5-year, BE delivered the higher annualized total return — AME at 18.12% versus BE at 62.19%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

AMETEK, Inc. (AME) vs Bloom Energy Corporation (BE)

AME leads on 10 of 13 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of AMETEK, Inc. and Bloom Energy Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 16, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

AME

AMETEK, Inc.

$54.39B

$237.30IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 16, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Bloom Energy Corporation

$58.80B

$206.73IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 16, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — AME vs BE

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8y

AME +238.5%BE +808.4%BE compounded faster

AME BE

AME vs BE: by the numbers

•BE is the larger company ($58.80B vs $54.39B market cap).
•AME converts more revenue to profit (20.11% vs 0.25% net margin).
•BE grew revenue faster over the past five years (24.12% vs 10.78% CAGR).
•AME pays a dividend (0.56% yield) while BE does not currently pay one.

Which is better, AME or BE?

Metric tally: AME 10 · BE 3

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthBE(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityAME(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	AME	BE
P/E ratio	35.27	—
Forward P/E	28.64●	111.75
P/S ratio	7.06●	31.25
P/B ratio	4.92●	83.05
PEG ratio	4.05	—
EV / EBITDA	22.97●	302.90
FCF yield	3.17%●	0.30%

Profitability

Metric	AME	BE
Gross margin	36.56%●	31.11%
Operating margin	26.17%●	8.24%
Net margin	20.11%●	0.25%
ROE	13.99%●	0.65%
ROIC	10.99%●	1.89%

Dividends

Metric	AME	BE
Dividend yield	0.56%	—
Payout ratio	20.25%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AME	BE
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	10.78%	24.12%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	11.06%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	6.90%	19.23%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	12.31%	62.19%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, AME or BE?: It depends on your goal. growth: BE (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: AME (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, AME leads 10 to 3.
Which has grown faster, AME or BE?: Over the past five years, BE grew revenue faster — AME at a 10.78% CAGR versus BE at 24.12%.
Does AME or BE pay a bigger dividend?: AME pays a dividend (0.56% yield) while BE does not currently pay one.
Is AME or BE more profitable?: AME runs the higher net margin — AME at 20.11% versus BE at 0.25%.
Which has been the better investment, AME or BE?: Over the past 5-year, BE delivered the higher annualized total return — AME at 18.12% versus BE at 62.19%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AME analysis Full BE analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

AMETEK P/E ratio Bloom Energy P/E ratio AMETEK dividend yield Bloom Energy dividend yield AMETEK ROE Bloom Energy ROE AMETEK operating margin Bloom Energy operating margin AMETEK revenue growth Bloom Energy revenue growth AMETEK free cash flow Bloom Energy free cash flow

AMETEK & Bloom Energy appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 16, 2026.