Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) vs Sandisk Corporation (SNDK)

AMAT leads on 6 of 10 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Applied Materials, Inc. and Sandisk Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 16, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Compare

Total return — AMAT vs SNDK

growth of $100 · last 1y
AMAT +216.2%SNDK +5432.1%SNDK compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
101001k10kStart $1002026$316$5,532
AMAT SNDK

AMAT vs SNDK: by the numbers

  • AMAT is the larger company ($462.13B vs $294.93B market cap).
  • AMAT trades at the lower earnings multiple (55.05 vs 69.22 P/E).
  • SNDK converts more revenue to profit (34.19% vs 29.31% net margin).
  • AMAT pays a dividend (0.33% yield) while SNDK does not currently pay one.

Which is better, AMAT or SNDK?

Metric tally: AMAT 6 · SNDK 4

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueAMAT(lower P/E)
QualityAMAT(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricAMATSNDK
P/E ratio55.0569.22
Forward P/E47.89
P/S ratio16.1323.72
P/B ratio19.5822.70
PEG ratio76.90
EV / EBITDA42.0257.01
FCF yield1.27%1.43%

Profitability

MetricAMATSNDK
Gross margin48.96%56.04%
Operating margin29.51%40.93%
Net margin29.31%34.19%
ROE35.58%32.71%
ROIC21.96%-11.89%

Dividends

MetricAMATSNDK
Dividend yield0.33%
Payout ratio21.93%

Growth (annualized)

MetricAMATSNDK
Revenue CAGR (5Y)9.33%
EPS CAGR (5Y)17.13%
FCF CAGR (5Y)9.02%
Total return CAGR (5Y)34.72%

Frequently asked

Which is better, AMAT or SNDK?
It depends on your goal. value: AMAT (lower P/E); quality: AMAT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, AMAT leads 6 to 4.
Is AMAT or SNDK cheaper?
On trailing earnings, AMAT is cheaper: AMAT trades at a 55.05 P/E and SNDK at 69.22.
Does AMAT or SNDK pay a bigger dividend?
AMAT pays a dividend (0.33% yield) while SNDK does not currently pay one.
Is AMAT or SNDK more profitable?
SNDK runs the higher net margin — AMAT at 29.31% versus SNDK at 34.19%.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 16, 2026.