Is AMAT or POWL cheaper?

On trailing earnings, AMAT is cheaper: AMAT trades at a 53.31 P/E and POWL at 57.61.

Which has grown faster, AMAT or POWL?

Over the past five years, POWL grew revenue faster — AMAT at a 9.33% CAGR versus POWL at 19.84%.

Does AMAT or POWL pay a bigger dividend?

AMAT yields 0.34% and POWL yields 0.12% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is AMAT or POWL more profitable?

AMAT runs the higher net margin — AMAT at 29.31% versus POWL at 16.51%.

Which has been the better investment, AMAT or POWL?

Over the past 10-year, POWL delivered the higher annualized total return — AMAT at 38.64% versus POWL at 47.08%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) vs Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL)

POWL leads on 11 of 17 compared metrics, though AMAT is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of Applied Materials, Inc. and Powell Industries, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

AMAT

Applied Materials, Inc.

$450.37B

$567.25Technology

POWL

Powell Industries, Inc.

$10.74B

$294.75Industrials

Total return — AMAT vs POWL

growth of $100 · last 30y

AMAT +12762.8%POWL +7124.3%AMAT compounded faster

AMAT POWL

AMAT vs POWL: by the numbers

•AMAT is the larger company ($450.37B vs $10.74B market cap).
•AMAT trades at the lower earnings multiple (53.31 vs 57.61 P/E).
•AMAT converts more revenue to profit (29.31% vs 16.51% net margin).
•POWL grew revenue faster over the past five years (19.84% vs 9.33% CAGR).
•AMAT pays the higher dividend yield (0.34% vs 0.12%).

Which is better, AMAT or POWL?

Metric tally: AMAT 6 · POWL 11

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueAMAT(lower P/E)

GrowthPOWL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityPOWL(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	AMAT	POWL
P/E ratio	53.31●	57.61
Forward P/E	46.38	44.88●
P/S ratio	15.62	9.51●
P/B ratio	18.96	15.19●
PEG ratio	76.90	1.03●
EV / EBITDA	42.42	41.17●
FCF yield	1.32%	1.79%●

Profitability

Metric	AMAT	POWL
Gross margin	48.96%●	30.10%
Operating margin	29.51%●	19.76%
Net margin	29.31%●	16.51%
ROE	35.58%●	26.36%
ROIC	21.96%	25.41%●

Dividends

Metric	AMAT	POWL
Dividend yield	0.34%●	0.12%
Payout ratio	21.93%	7.18%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AMAT	POWL
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.33%	19.84%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	17.13%	59.98%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	9.02%	34.56%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	34.01%	99.30%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, AMAT or POWL?: It depends on your goal. value: AMAT (lower P/E); growth: POWL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: POWL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, POWL leads 11 to 6.
Is AMAT or POWL cheaper?: On trailing earnings, AMAT is cheaper: AMAT trades at a 53.31 P/E and POWL at 57.61.
Which has grown faster, AMAT or POWL?: Over the past five years, POWL grew revenue faster — AMAT at a 9.33% CAGR versus POWL at 19.84%.
Does AMAT or POWL pay a bigger dividend?: AMAT yields 0.34% and POWL yields 0.12% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is AMAT or POWL more profitable?: AMAT runs the higher net margin — AMAT at 29.31% versus POWL at 16.51%.
Which has been the better investment, AMAT or POWL?: Over the past 10-year, POWL delivered the higher annualized total return — AMAT at 38.64% versus POWL at 47.08%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AMAT analysis Full POWL analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Applied Materials P/E ratio Powell Industries P/E ratio Applied Materials dividend yield Powell Industries dividend yield Applied Materials ROE Powell Industries ROE Applied Materials operating margin Powell Industries operating margin Applied Materials revenue growth Powell Industries revenue growth Applied Materials free cash flow Powell Industries free cash flow

Applied Materials & Powell Industries appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.