Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) vs Terreno Realty Corporation (TRNO)
AM and TRNO are evenly matched — 8 metrics each of 16.
A side-by-side comparison of Antero Midstream Corporation and Terreno Realty Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
AM
Antero Midstream Corporation
$21.67Energy
TRNO
Terreno Realty Corporation
$67.27Real Estate
Total return — AM vs TRNO
growth of $100 · last 9yAM -35.8%TRNO +118.3%TRNO compounded faster
AM TRNO
AM vs TRNO: by the numbers
- •AM is the larger company ($10.29B vs $7.15B market cap).
- •TRNO trades at the lower earnings multiple (16.49 vs 25.20 P/E).
- •TRNO converts more revenue to profit (86.52% vs 31.94% net margin).
- •TRNO grew revenue faster over the past five years (20.57% vs 5.93% CAGR).
- •AM pays the higher dividend yield (4.15% vs 3.05%).
Which is better, AM or TRNO?
Metric tally: AM 8 · TRNO 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueTRNO(lower P/E)
GrowthTRNO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeAM(higher dividend yield)
QualityAM(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | AM | TRNO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 25.20 | 16.49● |
| Forward P/E | 17.03● | 40.04 |
| P/S ratio | 8.06● | 14.43 |
| P/B ratio | 5.35 | 1.65● |
| PEG ratio | 5.69 | 0.14● |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.51 | 13.82● |
| FCF yield | 8.84%● | 2.87% |
Profitability
| Metric | AM | TRNO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 64.52% | 63.89% |
| Operating margin | 57.56%● | 40.81% |
| Net margin | 31.94% | 86.52%● |
| ROE | 21.21%● | 9.88% |
| ROIC | 8.18%● | 3.66% |
Dividends
| Metric | AM | TRNO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 4.15%● | 3.05% |
| Payout ratio | 104.65% | 52.16% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AM | TRNO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 5.93% | 20.57%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -13.48% | 35.52%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 7.24% | 22.41%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 24.03%● | 3.07% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AM or TRNO?
- It depends on your goal. value: TRNO (lower P/E); growth: TRNO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: AM (higher dividend yield); quality: AM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
- Is AM or TRNO cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, TRNO is cheaper: AM trades at a 25.20 P/E and TRNO at 16.49.
- Which has grown faster, AM or TRNO?
- Over the past five years, TRNO grew revenue faster — AM at a 5.93% CAGR versus TRNO at 20.57%.
- Does AM or TRNO pay a bigger dividend?
- AM yields 4.15% and TRNO yields 3.05% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is AM or TRNO more profitable?
- TRNO runs the higher net margin — AM at 31.94% versus TRNO at 86.52%.
- Which has been the better investment, AM or TRNO?
- Over the past 5-year, AM delivered the higher annualized total return — AM at 24.03% versus TRNO at 13.47%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Antero Midstream P/E ratioTerreno Realty P/E ratioAntero Midstream dividend yieldTerreno Realty dividend yieldAntero Midstream ROETerreno Realty ROEAntero Midstream operating marginTerreno Realty operating marginAntero Midstream revenue growthTerreno Realty revenue growthAntero Midstream free cash flowTerreno Realty free cash flow
Antero Midstream & Terreno Realty appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.