Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) vs EQT Corporation (EQT)
A side-by-side comparison of Antero Midstream Corporation and EQT Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 19, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
AM
Antero Midstream Corporation
$22.42EnergyDelayed quote: Aug 19, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
EQT
EQT Corporation
$53.64EnergyAt close: Aug 19, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — AM vs EQT
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 9yAM +47.2% (+4.4%/yr)EQT +85.7% (+7.1%/yr)EQT compounded faster over this window
AM EQT
AM vs EQT: by the numbers
- •EQT is the larger company ($33.55B vs $10.64B market cap).
- •EQT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (11.81 vs 26.69 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •EQT converts more revenue to profit (30.68% vs 30.45% net margin).
- •EQT grew revenue faster over the past five years (20.44% vs 6.09% CAGR).
- •AM pays the higher dividend yield (4.01% vs 1.23%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AM | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 26.69 | 11.81 |
| Forward P/E | 20.19 | 12.67 |
| P/S ratio | 8.15 | 3.61 |
| P/B ratio | 5.50 | 1.33 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.98 | 5.83 |
| FCF yield | 9.16% | 11.22% |
Profitability
| Metric | AM | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 62.92% | 48.86% |
| Operating margin | 56.05% | 34.70% |
| Net margin | 30.45% | 30.68% |
| ROE | 20.55% | 11.28% |
| ROIC | 8.64% | 7.85% |
Dividends
| Metric | AM | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 4.01% | 1.23% |
| Payout ratio | 104.65% | 19.82% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AM | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 6.09% | 20.44% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 9.87% | 157.06% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 29.36% | 28.80% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, AM or EQT?
- EQT has the lower trailing P/E: AM trades at 26.69 and EQT at 11.81. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, AM or EQT?
- Over the past five years, EQT grew revenue faster — AM at a 6.09% CAGR versus EQT at 20.44%.
- Does AM or EQT pay a bigger dividend?
- AM yields 4.01% and EQT yields 1.23% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is AM or EQT more profitable?
- EQT runs the higher net margin — AM at 30.45% versus EQT at 30.68%.
- How have AM and EQT total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, AM delivered 29.36% and EQT delivered 4.24% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Antero Midstream P/E ratioEQT P/E ratioAntero Midstream dividend yieldEQT dividend yieldAntero Midstream ROEEQT ROEAntero Midstream operating marginEQT operating marginAntero Midstream revenue growthEQT revenue growthAntero Midstream free cash flowEQT free cash flow
Antero Midstream & EQT appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 19, 2026.