Is AM or EQT cheaper?

On trailing earnings, EQT is cheaper: AM trades at a 25.20 P/E and EQT at 9.62.

Which has grown faster, AM or EQT?

Over the past five years, EQT grew revenue faster — AM at a 5.93% CAGR versus EQT at 26.65%.

Does AM or EQT pay a bigger dividend?

AM yields 4.15% and EQT yields 1.26% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is AM or EQT more profitable?

EQT runs the higher net margin — AM at 31.94% versus EQT at 33.40%.

Which has been the better investment, AM or EQT?

Over the past 5-year, AM delivered the higher annualized total return — AM at 24.03% versus EQT at 3.28%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) vs EQT Corporation (EQT)

EQT leads on 11 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Antero Midstream Corporation and EQT Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Antero Midstream Corporation

Total return — AM vs EQT

growth of $100 · last 9y

AM -35.8%EQT +61.5%EQT compounded faster

AM EQT

AM vs EQT: by the numbers

•EQT is the larger company ($32.49B vs $10.29B market cap).
•EQT trades at the lower earnings multiple (9.62 vs 25.20 P/E).
•EQT converts more revenue to profit (33.40% vs 31.94% net margin).
•EQT grew revenue faster over the past five years (26.65% vs 5.93% CAGR).
•AM pays the higher dividend yield (4.15% vs 1.26%).

Which is better, AM or EQT?

Metric tally: AM 5 · EQT 11

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueEQT(lower P/E)

GrowthEQT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeAM(higher dividend yield)

QualityAM(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	AM	EQT
P/E ratio	25.20	9.62●
Forward P/E	17.03	11.09●
P/S ratio	8.06	3.24●
P/B ratio	5.35	1.29●
PEG ratio	5.69	0.03●
EV / EBITDA	14.51	4.97●
FCF yield	8.84%	12.50%●

Profitability

Metric	AM	EQT
Gross margin	64.52%	64.05%
Operating margin	57.56%●	46.73%
Net margin	31.94%	33.40%●
ROE	21.21%●	13.34%
ROIC	8.18%●	6.18%

Dividends

Metric	AM	EQT
Dividend yield	4.15%●	1.26%
Payout ratio	104.65%	19.59%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AM	EQT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	5.93%	26.65%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-13.48%	-10.45%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	7.24%	58.98%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	24.03%●	19.27%

Frequently asked

Which is better, AM or EQT?: It depends on your goal. value: EQT (lower P/E); growth: EQT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: AM (higher dividend yield); quality: AM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, EQT leads 11 to 5.
Is AM or EQT cheaper?: On trailing earnings, EQT is cheaper: AM trades at a 25.20 P/E and EQT at 9.62.
Which has grown faster, AM or EQT?: Over the past five years, EQT grew revenue faster — AM at a 5.93% CAGR versus EQT at 26.65%.
Does AM or EQT pay a bigger dividend?: AM yields 4.15% and EQT yields 1.26% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is AM or EQT more profitable?: EQT runs the higher net margin — AM at 31.94% versus EQT at 33.40%.
Which has been the better investment, AM or EQT?: Over the past 5-year, AM delivered the higher annualized total return — AM at 24.03% versus EQT at 3.28%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AM analysis Full EQT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Antero Midstream P/E ratio EQT P/E ratio Antero Midstream dividend yield EQT dividend yield Antero Midstream ROE EQT ROE Antero Midstream operating margin EQT operating margin Antero Midstream revenue growth EQT revenue growth Antero Midstream free cash flow EQT free cash flow

Antero Midstream & EQT appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.