Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) vs Cameco Corporation (CCJ)
AM leads on 12 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Antero Midstream Corporation and Cameco Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 16, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — AM vs CCJ
growth of $100 · last 9yAM -36.8%CCJ +977.7%CCJ compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
AM CCJ
AM vs CCJ: by the numbers
- •CCJ is the larger company ($46.61B vs $10.13B market cap).
- •AM trades at the lower earnings multiple (24.80 vs 97.84 P/E).
- •AM converts more revenue to profit (31.94% vs 18.49% net margin).
- •CCJ grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.99% vs 5.93% CAGR).
- •AM pays the higher dividend yield (4.22% vs 0.16%).
Which is better, AM or CCJ?
Metric tally: AM 12 · CCJ 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueAM(lower P/E)
GrowthCCJ(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeAM(higher dividend yield)
QualityAM(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AM | CCJ |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 24.80● | 97.84 |
| Forward P/E | 16.76● | 40.69 |
| P/S ratio | 7.93● | 18.16 |
| P/B ratio | 5.26● | 12.77 |
| PEG ratio | 5.69 | 0.39● |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.34● | 53.44 |
| FCF yield | 8.98%● | 1.41% |
Profitability
| Metric | AM | CCJ |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 64.52%● | 29.79% |
| Operating margin | 57.56%● | 16.59% |
| Net margin | 31.94%● | 18.49% |
| ROE | 21.21%● | 13.00% |
| ROIC | 8.18%● | 4.77% |
Dividends
| Metric | AM | CCJ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 4.22%● | 0.16% |
| Payout ratio | 104.65% | 17.49% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AM | CCJ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 5.93% | 13.99%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -13.48% | 37.38%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 7.24% | 26.83%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 24.15% | 39.96%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AM or CCJ?
- It depends on your goal. value: AM (lower P/E); growth: CCJ (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: AM (higher dividend yield); quality: AM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, AM leads 12 to 5.
- Is AM or CCJ cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, AM is cheaper: AM trades at a 24.80 P/E and CCJ at 97.84.
- Which has grown faster, AM or CCJ?
- Over the past five years, CCJ grew revenue faster — AM at a 5.93% CAGR versus CCJ at 13.99%.
- Does AM or CCJ pay a bigger dividend?
- AM yields 4.22% and CCJ yields 0.16% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is AM or CCJ more profitable?
- AM runs the higher net margin — AM at 31.94% versus CCJ at 18.49%.
- Which has been the better investment, AM or CCJ?
- Over the past 5-year, CCJ delivered the higher annualized total return — AM at 24.15% versus CCJ at 26.36%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Antero Midstream P/E ratioCameco P/E ratioAntero Midstream dividend yieldCameco dividend yieldAntero Midstream ROECameco ROEAntero Midstream operating marginCameco operating marginAntero Midstream revenue growthCameco revenue growthAntero Midstream free cash flowCameco free cash flow
Antero Midstream & Cameco appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 16, 2026.