Is AKAM or RL cheaper?

On trailing earnings, RL is cheaper: AKAM trades at a 44.95 P/E and RL at 26.74.

Which has grown faster, AKAM or RL?

Over the past five years, RL grew revenue faster — AKAM at a 5.42% CAGR versus RL at 13.01%.

Does AKAM or RL pay a bigger dividend?

RL pays a dividend (0.90% yield) while AKAM does not currently pay one.

Is AKAM or RL more profitable?

RL runs the higher net margin — AKAM at 10.20% versus RL at 11.60%.

Which has been the better investment, AKAM or RL?

Over the past 10-year, RL delivered the higher annualized total return — AKAM at 9.73% versus RL at 17.77%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM) vs Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL)

RL leads on 11 of 14 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Akamai Technologies, Inc. and Ralph Lauren Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

AKAM

Akamai Technologies, Inc.

$19.41B

$133.50Technology

Ralph Lauren Corporation

$24.64B

$403.98Consumer Cyclical

Total return — AKAM vs RL

growth of $100 · last 27y

AKAM -8.0%RL +2047.7%RL compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

AKAM RL

AKAM vs RL: by the numbers

•RL is the larger company ($24.64B vs $19.41B market cap).
•RL trades at the lower earnings multiple (26.74 vs 44.95 P/E).
•RL converts more revenue to profit (11.60% vs 10.20% net margin).
•RL grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.01% vs 5.42% CAGR).
•RL pays a dividend (0.90% yield) while AKAM does not currently pay one.

Which is better, AKAM or RL?

Metric tally: AKAM 3 · RL 11

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueRL(lower P/E)

GrowthRL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityRL(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	AKAM	RL
P/E ratio	44.95	26.74●
Forward P/E	18.70●	22.03
P/S ratio	4.69	3.10●
P/B ratio	4.08●	8.86
PEG ratio	—	0.71
EV / EBITDA	22.14	22.22
FCF yield	3.82%●	2.96%

Profitability

Metric	AKAM	RL
Gross margin	57.23%	69.87%●
Operating margin	13.67%	14.53%●
Net margin	10.20%	11.60%●
ROE	8.87%	33.13%●
ROIC	4.35%	19.62%●

Dividends

Metric	AKAM	RL
Dividend yield	—	0.90%
Payout ratio	—	23.67%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AKAM	RL
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	5.42%	13.01%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-1.94%	20.37%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	6.42%	22.25%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	2.42%	29.56%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, AKAM or RL?: It depends on your goal. value: RL (lower P/E); growth: RL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: RL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, RL leads 11 to 3.
Is AKAM or RL cheaper?: On trailing earnings, RL is cheaper: AKAM trades at a 44.95 P/E and RL at 26.74.
Which has grown faster, AKAM or RL?: Over the past five years, RL grew revenue faster — AKAM at a 5.42% CAGR versus RL at 13.01%.
Does AKAM or RL pay a bigger dividend?: RL pays a dividend (0.90% yield) while AKAM does not currently pay one.
Is AKAM or RL more profitable?: RL runs the higher net margin — AKAM at 10.20% versus RL at 11.60%.
Which has been the better investment, AKAM or RL?: Over the past 10-year, RL delivered the higher annualized total return — AKAM at 9.73% versus RL at 17.77%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AKAM analysis Full RL analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Akamai Technologies P/E ratio Ralph Lauren P/E ratio Akamai Technologies dividend yield Ralph Lauren dividend yield Akamai Technologies ROE Ralph Lauren ROE Akamai Technologies operating margin Ralph Lauren operating margin Akamai Technologies revenue growth Ralph Lauren revenue growth Akamai Technologies free cash flow Ralph Lauren free cash flow

Akamai Technologies & Ralph Lauren appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.