Aflac Incorporated (AFL) vs The Travelers Companies, Inc. (TRV)
TRV leads on 12 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Aflac Incorporated and The Travelers Companies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
AFL
Aflac Incorporated
$117.80Financial Services
TRV
The Travelers Companies, Inc.
$304.46Financial Services
Total return — AFL vs TRV
growth of $100 · last 30yAFL +3083.8%TRV +1057.2%AFL compounded faster
AFL TRV
AFL vs TRV: by the numbers
- •TRV is the larger company ($64.74B vs $59.96B market cap).
- •TRV trades at the lower earnings multiple (9.06 vs 13.45 P/E).
- •AFL converts more revenue to profit (25.44% vs 15.54% net margin).
- •TRV grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.61% vs -4.37% CAGR).
- •AFL pays the higher dividend yield (2.02% vs 1.49%).
Which is better, AFL or TRV?
Metric tally: AFL 5 · TRV 12It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueTRV(lower P/E)
GrowthTRV(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeAFL(higher dividend yield)
QualityTRV(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | AFL | TRV |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 13.45 | 9.06● |
| Forward P/E | 16.68 | 10.85● |
| P/S ratio | 3.33 | 1.36● |
| P/B ratio | 2.70 | 2.08● |
| PEG ratio | 26.89 | 0.37● |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.48 | 7.11● |
| FCF yield | 4.84% | 17.21%● |
Profitability
| Metric | AFL | TRV |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 47.76%● | 44.02% |
| Operating margin | 30.97%● | 19.30% |
| Net margin | 25.44%● | 15.54% |
| ROE | 20.66% | 23.77%● |
| ROIC | 3.21% | 12.10%● |
Dividends
| Metric | AFL | TRV |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.02%● | 1.49% |
| Payout ratio | 34.69% | 16.34% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AFL | TRV |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -4.37% | 8.61%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 0.50% | 21.40%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -13.07% | 10.08%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 18.59%● | 16.77% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AFL or TRV?
- It depends on your goal. value: TRV (lower P/E); growth: TRV (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: AFL (higher dividend yield); quality: TRV (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TRV leads 12 to 5.
- Is AFL or TRV cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, TRV is cheaper: AFL trades at a 13.45 P/E and TRV at 9.06.
- Which has grown faster, AFL or TRV?
- Over the past five years, TRV grew revenue faster — AFL at a -4.37% CAGR versus TRV at 8.61%.
- Does AFL or TRV pay a bigger dividend?
- AFL yields 2.02% and TRV yields 1.49% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is AFL or TRV more profitable?
- AFL runs the higher net margin — AFL at 25.44% versus TRV at 15.54%.
- Which has been the better investment, AFL or TRV?
- Over the past 10-year, AFL delivered the higher annualized total return — AFL at 15.72% versus TRV at 12.75%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Aflac P/E ratioTravelers Companies P/E ratioAflac dividend yieldTravelers Companies dividend yieldAflac ROETravelers Companies ROEAflac operating marginTravelers Companies operating marginAflac revenue growthTravelers Companies revenue growthAflac free cash flowTravelers Companies free cash flow
Aflac & Travelers Companies appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.