Aflac Incorporated (AFL) vs State Street Corporation (STT)
STT leads on 7 of 13 compared metrics, though AFL is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Aflac Incorporated and State Street Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 18, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
AFL
Aflac Incorporated
$116.24Financial Services
STT
State Street Corporation
$171.29Financial Services
Total return — AFL vs STT
growth of $100 · last 30yAFL +3093.4%STT +1205.4%AFL compounded faster
AFL STT
AFL vs STT: by the numbers
- •AFL is the larger company ($59.16B vs $47.79B market cap).
- •AFL trades at the lower earnings multiple (13.27 vs 17.39 P/E).
- •AFL converts more revenue to profit (25.44% vs 13.47% net margin).
- •STT grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.10% vs -4.37% CAGR).
- •AFL pays the higher dividend yield (2.05% vs 1.91%).
Which is better, AFL or STT?
Metric tally: AFL 6 · STT 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueAFL(lower P/E)
GrowthSTT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeAFL(higher dividend yield)
QualityAFL(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AFL | STT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 13.27● | 17.39 |
| Forward P/E | 16.45 | 13.78● |
| P/S ratio | 3.28 | 2.13● |
| P/B ratio | 2.00 | 1.75● |
| PEG ratio | 26.54 | 0.85● |
Profitability
| Metric | AFL | STT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 47.76% | 63.27%● |
| Operating margin | 30.97%● | 17.05% |
| Net margin | 25.44%● | 13.47% |
| ROE | 15.47%● | 11.05% |
| ROIC | 3.37%● | 3.21% |
Dividends
| Metric | AFL | STT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.05%● | 1.91% |
| Payout ratio | 34.69% | 34.35% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AFL | STT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -4.37% | 14.10%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 0.50% | 8.34%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 19.50% | 19.65% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AFL or STT?
- It depends on your goal. value: AFL (lower P/E); growth: STT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: AFL (higher dividend yield); quality: AFL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, STT leads 7 to 6.
- Is AFL or STT cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, AFL is cheaper: AFL trades at a 13.27 P/E and STT at 17.39.
- Which has grown faster, AFL or STT?
- Over the past five years, STT grew revenue faster — AFL at a -4.37% CAGR versus STT at 14.10%.
- Does AFL or STT pay a bigger dividend?
- AFL yields 2.05% and STT yields 1.91% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is AFL or STT more profitable?
- AFL runs the higher net margin — AFL at 25.44% versus STT at 13.47%.
- Which has been the better investment, AFL or STT?
- Over the past 10-year, AFL delivered the higher annualized total return — AFL at 15.60% versus STT at 14.81%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Aflac P/E ratioState Street P/E ratioAflac dividend yieldState Street dividend yieldAflac ROEState Street ROEAflac operating marginState Street operating marginAflac revenue growthState Street revenue growthAflac free cash flowState Street free cash flow
Aflac & State Street appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 18, 2026.