Is AFL or CHTR cheaper?

On trailing earnings, CHTR is cheaper: AFL trades at a 13.45 P/E and CHTR at 3.94.

Which has grown faster, AFL or CHTR?

Over the past five years, CHTR grew revenue faster — AFL at a -4.37% CAGR versus CHTR at 2.25%.

Does AFL or CHTR pay a bigger dividend?

AFL pays a dividend (2.02% yield) while CHTR does not currently pay one.

Is AFL or CHTR more profitable?

AFL runs the higher net margin — AFL at 25.44% versus CHTR at 9.03%.

Which has been the better investment, AFL or CHTR?

Over the past 10-year, AFL delivered the higher annualized total return — AFL at 15.72% versus CHTR at -4.18%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Aflac Incorporated (AFL) vs Charter Communications, Inc. (CHTR)

CHTR leads on 12 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Aflac Incorporated and Charter Communications, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

AFL

Aflac Incorporated

$59.96B

$117.80Financial Services

CHTR

Charter Communications, Inc.

$20.59B

$145.82Communication Services

Total return — AFL vs CHTR

growth of $100 · last 16y

AFL +377.1%CHTR +316.6%AFL compounded faster

AFL CHTR

AFL vs CHTR: by the numbers

•AFL is the larger company ($59.96B vs $20.59B market cap).
•CHTR trades at the lower earnings multiple (3.94 vs 13.45 P/E).
•AFL converts more revenue to profit (25.44% vs 9.03% net margin).
•CHTR grew revenue faster over the past five years (2.25% vs -4.37% CAGR).
•AFL pays a dividend (2.02% yield) while CHTR does not currently pay one.

Which is better, AFL or CHTR?

Metric tally: AFL 4 · CHTR 12

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueCHTR(lower P/E)

GrowthCHTR(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityCHTR(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	AFL	CHTR
P/E ratio	13.45	3.94●
Forward P/E	16.68	3.23●
P/S ratio	3.33	0.34●
P/B ratio	2.70	1.13●
PEG ratio	26.89	1.47●
EV / EBITDA	9.48	5.59●
FCF yield	4.84%	21.79%●

Profitability

Metric	AFL	CHTR
Gross margin	47.76%●	43.26%
Operating margin	30.97%●	24.11%
Net margin	25.44%●	9.03%
ROE	20.66%	30.11%●
ROIC	3.21%	7.23%●

Dividends

Metric	AFL	CHTR
Dividend yield	2.02%	—
Payout ratio	34.69%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AFL	CHTR
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-4.37%	2.25%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	0.50%	18.42%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-13.07%	-10.92%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	18.59%●	-26.64%

Frequently asked

Which is better, AFL or CHTR?: It depends on your goal. value: CHTR (lower P/E); growth: CHTR (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CHTR (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CHTR leads 12 to 4.
Is AFL or CHTR cheaper?: On trailing earnings, CHTR is cheaper: AFL trades at a 13.45 P/E and CHTR at 3.94.
Which has grown faster, AFL or CHTR?: Over the past five years, CHTR grew revenue faster — AFL at a -4.37% CAGR versus CHTR at 2.25%.
Does AFL or CHTR pay a bigger dividend?: AFL pays a dividend (2.02% yield) while CHTR does not currently pay one.
Is AFL or CHTR more profitable?: AFL runs the higher net margin — AFL at 25.44% versus CHTR at 9.03%.
Which has been the better investment, AFL or CHTR?: Over the past 10-year, AFL delivered the higher annualized total return — AFL at 15.72% versus CHTR at -4.18%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AFL analysis Full CHTR analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Aflac P/E ratio Charter Communications P/E ratio Aflac dividend yield Charter Communications dividend yield Aflac ROE Charter Communications ROE Aflac operating margin Charter Communications operating margin Aflac revenue growth Charter Communications revenue growth Aflac free cash flow Charter Communications free cash flow

Aflac & Charter Communications appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Dividend Aristocrats Highest ROE Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.