Aflac Incorporated (AFL) vs Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM)
BAM leads on 8 of 12 compared metrics, though AFL is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Aflac Incorporated and Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 29, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
AFL
Aflac Incorporated
$120.15Financial Services
BAM
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.
$44.62Financial Services
Total return — AFL vs BAM
growth of $100 · last 4yAFL +67.0%BAM +39.4%AFL compounded faster
AFL BAM
AFL vs BAM: by the numbers
- •BAM is the larger company ($70.13B vs $61.15B market cap).
- •AFL trades at the lower earnings multiple (13.72 vs 28.97 P/E).
- •BAM converts more revenue to profit (52.33% vs 25.44% net margin).
- •BAM grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.43% vs -4.37% CAGR).
- •BAM pays the higher dividend yield (4.50% vs 2.03%).
Which is better, AFL or BAM?
Metric tally: AFL 4 · BAM 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueAFL(lower P/E)
GrowthBAM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeBAM(higher dividend yield)
QualityBAM(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AFL | BAM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 13.72● | 28.97 |
| Forward P/E | 17.00● | 25.18 |
| P/S ratio | 3.39● | 15.10 |
| P/B ratio | 2.06● | 9.49 |
| PEG ratio | 27.43 | 2.15● |
Profitability
| Metric | AFL | BAM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 38.93% | 71.84%● |
| Operating margin | 30.97% | 63.13%● |
| Net margin | 25.44% | 52.33%● |
| ROE | 15.47% | 32.88%● |
| ROIC | 3.37% | 14.45%● |
Dividends
| Metric | AFL | BAM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.03% | 4.50%● |
| Payout ratio | 35.57% | 130.52% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AFL | BAM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -4.37% | 16.43%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 0.50% | — |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 19.94% | — |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AFL or BAM?
- It depends on your goal. value: AFL (lower P/E); growth: BAM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: BAM (higher dividend yield); quality: BAM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, BAM leads 8 to 4.
- Is AFL or BAM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, AFL is cheaper: AFL trades at a 13.72 P/E and BAM at 28.97.
- Which has grown faster, AFL or BAM?
- Over the past five years, BAM grew revenue faster — AFL at a -4.37% CAGR versus BAM at 16.43%.
- Does AFL or BAM pay a bigger dividend?
- AFL yields 2.03% and BAM yields 4.50% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is AFL or BAM more profitable?
- BAM runs the higher net margin — AFL at 25.44% versus BAM at 52.33%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Aflac P/E ratioBrookfield Asset Management P/E ratioAflac dividend yieldBrookfield Asset Management dividend yieldAflac ROEBrookfield Asset Management ROEAflac operating marginBrookfield Asset Management operating marginAflac revenue growthBrookfield Asset Management revenue growthAflac free cash flowBrookfield Asset Management free cash flow
Aflac & Brookfield Asset Management appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 29, 2026.