Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) vs United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC)
ADSK leads on 9 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Autodesk, Inc. and United Microelectronics Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
ADSK
Autodesk, Inc.
$217.80TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 20, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
UMC
United Microelectronics Corporation
$20.30TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 20, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — ADSK vs UMC
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 26yADSK +3050.1%UMC +324.5%ADSK compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
ADSK UMC
ADSK vs UMC: by the numbers
- •UMC is the larger company ($50.64B vs $45.99B market cap).
- •ADSK trades at the lower earnings multiple (31.75 vs 37.66 P/E).
- •UMC converts more revenue to profit (20.72% vs 19.49% net margin).
- •ADSK grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.03% vs 10.42% CAGR).
- •UMC pays a dividend (2.38% yield) while ADSK does not currently pay one.
Which is better, ADSK or UMC?
Metric tally: ADSK 9 · UMC 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueADSK(lower P/E)
GrowthADSK(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityADSK(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ADSK | UMC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 31.75● | 37.66 |
| Forward P/E | 21.28 | — |
| P/S ratio | 6.15● | 6.62 |
| P/B ratio | 14.48 | 4.19● |
| PEG ratio | 22.51 | 7.19● |
| EV / EBITDA | 21.06 | 14.69● |
| FCF yield | 5.91%● | 3.13% |
Profitability
| Metric | ADSK | UMC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 91.14%● | 29.60% |
| Operating margin | 26.60%● | 18.85% |
| Net margin | 19.49% | 20.72%● |
| ROE | 45.88%● | 12.74% |
| ROIC | 18.74%● | 7.35% |
Dividends
| Metric | ADSK | UMC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 2.38% |
| Payout ratio | — | 90.81% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ADSK | UMC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 14.03%● | 10.42% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -0.85% | 4.35%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 15.08%● | 4.28% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -5.96% | 23.85%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ADSK or UMC?
- It depends on your goal. value: ADSK (lower P/E); growth: ADSK (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: ADSK (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ADSK leads 9 to 6.
- Is ADSK or UMC cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, ADSK is cheaper: ADSK trades at a 31.75 P/E and UMC at 37.66.
- Which has grown faster, ADSK or UMC?
- Over the past five years, ADSK grew revenue faster — ADSK at a 14.03% CAGR versus UMC at 10.42%.
- Does ADSK or UMC pay a bigger dividend?
- UMC pays a dividend (2.38% yield) while ADSK does not currently pay one.
- Is ADSK or UMC more profitable?
- UMC runs the higher net margin — ADSK at 19.49% versus UMC at 20.72%.
- Which has been the better investment, ADSK or UMC?
- Over the past 10-year, UMC delivered the higher annualized total return — ADSK at 14.10% versus UMC at 32.16%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Autodesk P/E ratioUnited Microelectronics P/E ratioAutodesk dividend yieldUnited Microelectronics dividend yieldAutodesk ROEUnited Microelectronics ROEAutodesk operating marginUnited Microelectronics operating marginAutodesk revenue growthUnited Microelectronics revenue growthAutodesk free cash flowUnited Microelectronics free cash flow
Autodesk & United Microelectronics appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 20, 2026.