Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) vs GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS)
ADSK leads on 11 of 13 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Autodesk, Inc. and GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — ADSK vs GFS
growth of $100 · last 5yADSK -37.5%GFS +67.0%GFS compounded faster
ADSK GFS
ADSK vs GFS: by the numbers
- •GFS is the larger company ($44.63B vs $41.90B market cap).
- •ADSK trades at the lower earnings multiple (28.93 vs 58.55 P/E).
- •ADSK converts more revenue to profit (19.49% vs 11.37% net margin).
- •ADSK grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.03% vs 6.81% CAGR).
- •GFS pays a dividend (0.15% yield) while ADSK does not currently pay one.
Which is better, ADSK or GFS?
Metric tally: ADSK 11 · GFS 2It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueADSK(lower P/E)
GrowthADSK(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityADSK(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | ADSK | GFS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 28.93● | 58.55 |
| Forward P/E | 13.96● | 42.97 |
| P/S ratio | 5.60● | 6.67 |
| P/B ratio | 13.19 | 3.90● |
| PEG ratio | 22.52 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 19.90● | 20.82 |
| FCF yield | 6.49%● | 2.35% |
Profitability
| Metric | ADSK | GFS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 91.14%● | 26.40% |
| Operating margin | 26.60%● | 12.08% |
| Net margin | 19.49%● | 11.37% |
| ROE | 45.88%● | 6.65% |
| ROIC | 18.74%● | 5.23% |
Dividends
| Metric | ADSK | GFS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 0.15% |
| Payout ratio | — | 7.55% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ADSK | GFS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 14.03%● | 6.81% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -0.85% | — |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 15.08% | 45.78%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -6.49% | — |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ADSK or GFS?
- It depends on your goal. value: ADSK (lower P/E); growth: ADSK (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: ADSK (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ADSK leads 11 to 2.
- Is ADSK or GFS cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, ADSK is cheaper: ADSK trades at a 28.93 P/E and GFS at 58.55.
- Which has grown faster, ADSK or GFS?
- Over the past five years, ADSK grew revenue faster — ADSK at a 14.03% CAGR versus GFS at 6.81%.
- Does ADSK or GFS pay a bigger dividend?
- GFS pays a dividend (0.15% yield) while ADSK does not currently pay one.
- Is ADSK or GFS more profitable?
- ADSK runs the higher net margin — ADSK at 19.49% versus GFS at 11.37%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Autodesk P/E ratioGLOBALFOUNDRIES P/E ratioAutodesk dividend yieldGLOBALFOUNDRIES dividend yieldAutodesk ROEGLOBALFOUNDRIES ROEAutodesk operating marginGLOBALFOUNDRIES operating marginAutodesk revenue growthGLOBALFOUNDRIES revenue growthAutodesk free cash flowGLOBALFOUNDRIES free cash flow
Autodesk & GLOBALFOUNDRIES appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.