Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) vs PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP)
PEP leads on 11 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Archer-Daniels-Midland Company and PepsiCo, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
ADM
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
$85.92Consumer DefensiveAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
PEP
PepsiCo, Inc.
$136.64Consumer DefensiveAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — ADM vs PEP
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30yADM +1209.1%PEP +764.6%ADM compounded faster
ADM PEP
ADM vs PEP: by the numbers
- •PEP is the larger company ($186.65B vs $41.41B market cap).
- •PEP trades at the lower earnings multiple (17.91 vs 38.53 P/E).
- •PEP converts more revenue to profit (10.82% vs 1.34% net margin).
- •PEP grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.37% vs 3.38% CAGR).
- •PEP pays the higher dividend yield (4.21% vs 2.40%).
Which is better, ADM or PEP?
Metric tally: ADM 5 · PEP 11It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValuePEP(lower P/E)
GrowthPEP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomePEP(higher dividend yield)
QualityPEP(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ADM | PEP |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 38.53 | 17.91● |
| Forward P/E | 18.51 | 15.97● |
| P/S ratio | 0.52● | 1.93 |
| P/B ratio | 1.82● | 8.47 |
| PEG ratio | — | 7.46 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.81 | 12.20● |
| FCF yield | 11.52%● | 4.96% |
Profitability
| Metric | ADM | PEP |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 5.83% | 53.96%● |
| Operating margin | 1.52% | 14.96%● |
| Net margin | 1.34% | 10.82%● |
| ROE | 4.74% | 47.45%● |
| ROIC | 3.51% | 13.29%● |
Dividends
| Metric | ADM | PEP |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.40% | 4.21%● |
| Payout ratio | 92.38% | 95.32% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ADM | PEP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.38% | 5.37%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -6.73% | 2.40%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 18.75%● | 5.40% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 11.28%● | 0.36% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ADM or PEP?
- It depends on your goal. value: PEP (lower P/E); growth: PEP (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: PEP (higher dividend yield); quality: PEP (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, PEP leads 11 to 5.
- Is ADM or PEP cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, PEP is cheaper: ADM trades at a 38.53 P/E and PEP at 17.91.
- Which has grown faster, ADM or PEP?
- Over the past five years, PEP grew revenue faster — ADM at a 3.38% CAGR versus PEP at 5.37%.
- Does ADM or PEP pay a bigger dividend?
- ADM yields 2.40% and PEP yields 4.21% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ADM or PEP more profitable?
- PEP runs the higher net margin — ADM at 1.34% versus PEP at 10.82%.
- Which has been the better investment, ADM or PEP?
- Over the past 10-year, ADM delivered the higher annualized total return — ADM at 10.19% versus PEP at 5.44%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Archer-Daniels-Midland P/E ratioPepsiCo P/E ratioArcher-Daniels-Midland dividend yieldPepsiCo dividend yieldArcher-Daniels-Midland ROEPepsiCo ROEArcher-Daniels-Midland operating marginPepsiCo operating marginArcher-Daniels-Midland revenue growthPepsiCo revenue growthArcher-Daniels-Midland free cash flowPepsiCo free cash flow
Archer-Daniels-Midland & PepsiCo appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 25, 2026.