Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) vs Altria Group, Inc. (MO)
MO leads on 10 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Archer-Daniels-Midland Company and Altria Group, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 9, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
ADM
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
$78.98Consumer Defensive
MO
Altria Group, Inc.
$71.59Consumer Defensive
Total return — ADM vs MO
growth of $100 · last 30yADM +481.8%MO +114.1%ADM compounded faster
ADM MO
ADM vs MO: by the numbers
- •MO is the larger company ($119.55B vs $38.06B market cap).
- •MO trades at the lower earnings multiple (15.23 vs 36.00 P/E).
- •MO converts more revenue to profit (36.91% vs 1.34% net margin).
- •ADM grew revenue faster over the past five years (3.38% vs 1.08% CAGR).
- •MO pays the higher dividend yield (5.82% vs 2.59%).
Which is better, ADM or MO?
Metric tally: ADM 5 · MO 10It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueMO(lower P/E)
GrowthADM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeMO(higher dividend yield)
QualityMO(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ADM | MO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 36.00 | 15.23● |
| Forward P/E | 17.26 | 12.81● |
| P/S ratio | 0.48● | 5.58 |
| P/B ratio | 1.70 | — |
| PEG ratio | — | 1.34 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.98 | 12.66● |
| FCF yield | 12.33%● | 7.08% |
Profitability
| Metric | ADM | MO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 5.83% | 86.59%● |
| Operating margin | 1.52% | 74.80%● |
| Net margin | 1.34% | 36.91%● |
| ROE | 4.74%● | -198.37% |
| ROIC | 3.51% | 42.95%● |
Dividends
| Metric | ADM | MO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.59% | 5.82%● |
| Payout ratio | 93.27% | 103.16% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ADM | MO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.38%● | 1.08% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -6.73% | 11.36%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 18.75%● | 1.28% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 9.36% | 18.27%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ADM or MO?
- It depends on your goal. value: MO (lower P/E); growth: ADM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MO (higher dividend yield); quality: MO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MO leads 10 to 5.
- Is ADM or MO cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, MO is cheaper: ADM trades at a 36.00 P/E and MO at 15.23.
- Which has grown faster, ADM or MO?
- Over the past five years, ADM grew revenue faster — ADM at a 3.38% CAGR versus MO at 1.08%.
- Does ADM or MO pay a bigger dividend?
- ADM yields 2.59% and MO yields 5.82% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ADM or MO more profitable?
- MO runs the higher net margin — ADM at 1.34% versus MO at 36.91%.
- Which has been the better investment, ADM or MO?
- Over the past 10-year, ADM delivered the higher annualized total return — ADM at 9.52% versus MO at 7.53%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Archer-Daniels-Midland P/E ratioAltria P/E ratioArcher-Daniels-Midland dividend yieldAltria dividend yieldArcher-Daniels-Midland ROEAltria ROEArcher-Daniels-Midland operating marginAltria operating marginArcher-Daniels-Midland revenue growthAltria revenue growthArcher-Daniels-Midland free cash flowAltria free cash flow
Archer-Daniels-Midland & Altria appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 9, 2026.