Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) vs Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD)
BUD leads on 11 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Archer-Daniels-Midland Company and Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 9, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
ADM
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
$78.98Consumer Defensive
BUD
Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV
$79.34Consumer Defensive
Total return — ADM vs BUD
growth of $100 · last 17yADM +199.9%BUD +105.5%ADM compounded faster
ADM BUD
ADM vs BUD: by the numbers
- •BUD is the larger company ($153.38B vs $38.06B market cap).
- •BUD trades at the lower earnings multiple (12.95 vs 36.00 P/E).
- •BUD converts more revenue to profit (10.14% vs 1.34% net margin).
- •BUD grew revenue faster over the past five years (3.94% vs 3.38% CAGR).
- •BUD pays the higher dividend yield (2.97% vs 2.59%).
Which is better, ADM or BUD?
Metric tally: ADM 5 · BUD 11It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueBUD(lower P/E)
GrowthBUD(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeBUD(higher dividend yield)
QualityBUD(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ADM | BUD |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 36.00 | 12.95● |
| Forward P/E | 17.26● | 18.03 |
| P/S ratio | 0.48● | 1.30 |
| P/B ratio | 1.70● | 1.79 |
| PEG ratio | — | 1.00 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.98 | 4.47● |
| FCF yield | 12.33% | 14.29%● |
Profitability
| Metric | ADM | BUD |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 5.83% | 55.67%● |
| Operating margin | 1.52% | 31.82%● |
| Net margin | 1.34% | 10.14%● |
| ROE | 4.74% | 13.99%● |
| ROIC | 3.51% | 6.32%● |
Dividends
| Metric | ADM | BUD |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.59% | 2.97%● |
| Payout ratio | 93.27% | 67.91% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ADM | BUD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.38% | 3.94%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -6.73% | 37.66%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 18.75%● | 10.48% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 9.36%● | 4.07% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ADM or BUD?
- It depends on your goal. value: BUD (lower P/E); growth: BUD (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: BUD (higher dividend yield); quality: BUD (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, BUD leads 11 to 5.
- Is ADM or BUD cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, BUD is cheaper: ADM trades at a 36.00 P/E and BUD at 12.95.
- Which has grown faster, ADM or BUD?
- Over the past five years, BUD grew revenue faster — ADM at a 3.38% CAGR versus BUD at 3.94%.
- Does ADM or BUD pay a bigger dividend?
- ADM yields 2.59% and BUD yields 2.97% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ADM or BUD more profitable?
- BUD runs the higher net margin — ADM at 1.34% versus BUD at 10.14%.
- Which has been the better investment, ADM or BUD?
- Over the past 10-year, ADM delivered the higher annualized total return — ADM at 9.52% versus BUD at -2.72%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Archer-Daniels-Midland P/E ratioAnheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV P/E ratioArcher-Daniels-Midland dividend yieldAnheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV dividend yieldArcher-Daniels-Midland ROEAnheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV ROEArcher-Daniels-Midland operating marginAnheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV operating marginArcher-Daniels-Midland revenue growthAnheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV revenue growthArcher-Daniels-Midland free cash flowAnheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV free cash flow
Archer-Daniels-Midland & Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 9, 2026.