Aecom (ACM) vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK)
ACM leads on 12 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Aecom and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 16, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — ACM vs SWK
growth of $100 · last 19yACM +229.8%SWK +42.5%ACM compounded faster
ACM SWK
ACM vs SWK: by the numbers
- •SWK is the larger company ($13.37B vs $8.94B market cap).
- •ACM trades at the lower earnings multiple (16.73 vs 34.75 P/E).
- •ACM converts more revenue to profit (3.16% vs 2.44% net margin).
- •ACM grew revenue faster over the past five years (3.69% vs 0.68% CAGR).
- •SWK pays the higher dividend yield (3.92% vs 1.64%).
Which is better, ACM or SWK?
Metric tally: ACM 12 · SWK 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueACM(lower P/E)
GrowthACM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeSWK(higher dividend yield)
QualityACM(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ACM | SWK |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 16.73● | 34.75 |
| Forward P/E | 11.63● | 15.84 |
| P/S ratio | 0.56● | 0.85 |
| P/B ratio | 3.96 | 1.44● |
| PEG ratio | 0.72● | 0.82 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.05● | 15.18 |
| FCF yield | 4.56% | 5.61%● |
Profitability
| Metric | ACM | SWK |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 7.73% | 30.03%● |
| Operating margin | 6.38% | 7.79%● |
| Net margin | 3.16%● | 2.44% |
| ROE | 22.27%● | 4.13% |
| ROIC | 12.33%● | 6.41% |
Dividends
| Metric | ACM | SWK |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.64% | 3.92%● |
| Payout ratio | 26.89% | 125.28% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ACM | SWK |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.69%● | 0.68% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 25.59%● | -19.52% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -11.26%● | -17.64% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 2.74%● | -12.18% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ACM or SWK?
- It depends on your goal. value: ACM (lower P/E); growth: ACM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: SWK (higher dividend yield); quality: ACM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ACM leads 12 to 5.
- Is ACM or SWK cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, ACM is cheaper: ACM trades at a 16.73 P/E and SWK at 34.75.
- Which has grown faster, ACM or SWK?
- Over the past five years, ACM grew revenue faster — ACM at a 3.69% CAGR versus SWK at 0.68%.
- Does ACM or SWK pay a bigger dividend?
- ACM yields 1.64% and SWK yields 3.92% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ACM or SWK more profitable?
- ACM runs the higher net margin — ACM at 3.16% versus SWK at 2.44%.
- Which has been the better investment, ACM or SWK?
- Over the past 10-year, ACM delivered the higher annualized total return — ACM at 8.64% versus SWK at 0.04%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Aecom P/E ratioStanley Black & Decker P/E ratioAecom dividend yieldStanley Black & Decker dividend yieldAecom ROEStanley Black & Decker ROEAecom operating marginStanley Black & Decker operating marginAecom revenue growthStanley Black & Decker revenue growthAecom free cash flowStanley Black & Decker free cash flow
Aecom & Stanley Black & Decker appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 16, 2026.