Arcosa, Inc. (ACA) vs Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO)
SIMO leads on 12 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Arcosa, Inc. and Silicon Motion Technology Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
ACA
Arcosa, Inc.
$145.00IndustrialsAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
SIMO
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation
$270.90TechnologyAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — ACA vs SIMO
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8yACA +622.9%SIMO +697.9%SIMO compounded faster
ACA SIMO
ACA vs SIMO: by the numbers
- •SIMO is the larger company ($9.09B vs $7.12B market cap).
- •SIMO trades at the lower earnings multiple (21.10 vs 32.01 P/E).
- •SIMO converts more revenue to profit (16.02% vs 7.88% net margin).
- •SIMO grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.49% vs 8.38% CAGR).
- •SIMO pays the higher dividend yield (0.74% vs 0.14%).
Which is better, ACA or SIMO?
Metric tally: ACA 3 · SIMO 12It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSIMO(lower P/E)
GrowthSIMO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeSIMO(higher dividend yield)
QualitySIMO(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ACA | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 32.01 | 21.10● |
| Forward P/E | 33.89 | 30.51● |
| P/S ratio | 2.53 | 2.57 |
| P/B ratio | 2.71 | 2.74 |
| PEG ratio | 0.21 | 0.17● |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.28● | 16.83 |
| FCF yield | 3.34%● | 0.28% |
Profitability
| Metric | ACA | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 22.77% | 48.09%● |
| Operating margin | 11.81% | 12.77%● |
| Net margin | 7.88% | 16.02%● |
| ROE | 8.45% | 18.76%● |
| ROIC | 6.71% | 9.22%● |
Dividends
| Metric | ACA | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.14% | 0.74%● |
| Payout ratio | 4.71% | 13.70% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ACA | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.38% | 12.49%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 14.08% | 44.85%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -0.26%● | -42.15% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 22.81% | 37.15%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ACA or SIMO?
- It depends on your goal. value: SIMO (lower P/E); growth: SIMO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: SIMO (higher dividend yield); quality: SIMO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SIMO leads 12 to 3.
- Is ACA or SIMO cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, SIMO is cheaper: ACA trades at a 32.01 P/E and SIMO at 21.10.
- Which has grown faster, ACA or SIMO?
- Over the past five years, SIMO grew revenue faster — ACA at a 8.38% CAGR versus SIMO at 12.49%.
- Does ACA or SIMO pay a bigger dividend?
- ACA yields 0.14% and SIMO yields 0.74% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ACA or SIMO more profitable?
- SIMO runs the higher net margin — ACA at 7.88% versus SIMO at 16.02%.
- Which has been the better investment, ACA or SIMO?
- Over the past 5-year, ACA delivered the higher annualized total return — ACA at 22.81% versus SIMO at 20.85%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Arcosa P/E ratioSilicon Motion Technology P/E ratioArcosa dividend yieldSilicon Motion Technology dividend yieldArcosa ROESilicon Motion Technology ROEArcosa operating marginSilicon Motion Technology operating marginArcosa revenue growthSilicon Motion Technology revenue growthArcosa free cash flowSilicon Motion Technology free cash flow
Arcosa & Silicon Motion Technology appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 25, 2026.