Arcosa, Inc. (ACA) vs Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO)

SIMO leads on 12 of 15 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Arcosa, Inc. and Silicon Motion Technology Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Compare

Total returnACA vs SIMO

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8y
ACA +622.9%SIMO +697.9%SIMO compounded faster
2004006008001kStart $1002020202220242026$723$798
ACA SIMO

ACA vs SIMO: by the numbers

  • SIMO is the larger company ($9.09B vs $7.12B market cap).
  • SIMO trades at the lower earnings multiple (21.10 vs 32.01 P/E).
  • SIMO converts more revenue to profit (16.02% vs 7.88% net margin).
  • SIMO grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.49% vs 8.38% CAGR).
  • SIMO pays the higher dividend yield (0.74% vs 0.14%).

Which is better, ACA or SIMO?

Metric tally: ACA 3 · SIMO 12

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueSIMO(lower P/E)
GrowthSIMO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeSIMO(higher dividend yield)
QualitySIMO(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricACASIMO
P/E ratio32.0121.10
Forward P/E33.8930.51
P/S ratio2.532.57
P/B ratio2.712.74
PEG ratio0.210.17
EV / EBITDA15.2816.83
FCF yield3.34%0.28%

Profitability

MetricACASIMO
Gross margin22.77%48.09%
Operating margin11.81%12.77%
Net margin7.88%16.02%
ROE8.45%18.76%
ROIC6.71%9.22%

Dividends

MetricACASIMO
Dividend yield0.14%0.74%
Payout ratio4.71%13.70%

Growth (annualized)

MetricACASIMO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)8.38%12.49%
EPS CAGR (5Y)14.08%44.85%
FCF CAGR (5Y)-0.26%-42.15%
Total return CAGR (5Y)22.81%37.15%

Frequently asked

Which is better, ACA or SIMO?
It depends on your goal. value: SIMO (lower P/E); growth: SIMO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: SIMO (higher dividend yield); quality: SIMO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SIMO leads 12 to 3.
Is ACA or SIMO cheaper?
On trailing earnings, SIMO is cheaper: ACA trades at a 32.01 P/E and SIMO at 21.10.
Which has grown faster, ACA or SIMO?
Over the past five years, SIMO grew revenue faster — ACA at a 8.38% CAGR versus SIMO at 12.49%.
Does ACA or SIMO pay a bigger dividend?
ACA yields 0.14% and SIMO yields 0.74% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is ACA or SIMO more profitable?
SIMO runs the higher net margin — ACA at 7.88% versus SIMO at 16.02%.
Which has been the better investment, ACA or SIMO?
Over the past 5-year, ACA delivered the higher annualized total return — ACA at 22.81% versus SIMO at 20.85%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 25, 2026.